☪ Muslims curse the Jews and Christians five times a day. Quran 1:7 describes both the Jews, and Christians as the cursed ones.
On this matter, Sheikh Al-Islam ibn Taymiyya compiled his valuable book, The Necessity of the Straight Path in Distinction from the People of Hell.The straight path is a separate way [for the Muslims]; it is not the path of the Jews, who have evoked Allah’s anger, nor of the Christians, who have gone astray, and also not of those who recognize the truth but have not gone in its path… This is the separate path, the path of truth, the path of Allah, the path of the believers. The Muslim calls on his Lord every day to guide him, bring him success, and set him on this straight path, ‘the path of those upon whom You have bestowed favor’ .”
😈 The hateful and unholy book of Quran has many hate verses concerning Jews and Christians. (85% of them)
💭 The Mannheim attacks reveal Europe’s impotence The continent’s elites have built a system destined to fail
👉 By Ayaan Hirsi Ali
The more cynical among us are inclined to claim that they keep happening because no one really cares. But that is lazy thinking. Not all of these politicians are feckless monsters, however temporarily gratifying it may feel to say so.
“Not all of these politicians are feckless monsters, however temporarily gratifying it may feel to say so.”
So why do they seem to do nothing? Part of the answer — a significant part of the answer — lies with the cluster of policies and assumptions that all mainstream European countries have written into their rules regarding immigration.
The first concerns treaties. These governments are signatories to international treaties that inadvertently leave them with no option but to leave their borders unprotected and to allow unwanted migrants to stay put. The Geneva Convention on Refugees. The European Court of Human Rights. As long as these are in place, national governments can do little to stop Islamists from entering — even if they wanted to.
The second concerns constitutions. Western nations abide by constitutional laws that leave them with no alternative but to allow the Islamists to recruit operatives and establish networks, mosques, schools and charities devoted to the spread of political Islam. Again, there is nothing they are able to do, because Islam is not singled out in their constitution as a singular cause for concern. If it were, the lawyers for these institutions would sue, saying that it is illegal to treat Islam differently. And, infuriatingly, under the current system, they would be right.
The third concerns perceptions. Our governments assume that anyone — citizen or organisation; journalist, politician or academic — critical of the government’s way of handling Islamism is a dangerous bigot who must be shamed into silence. Maybe such attitudes were forgivable half a century ago, but it is pretty obvious now that there is nothing bigoted about fearing Islamism. Islamists make that clear with increasing regularity. Nonetheless, it is not as if any human is immune to the effects of the echo chamber. The elites swim in a pool where everyone believes that racism underlies opposition to open borders. This is particularly true of Germany’s elites, who are still so focused on stopping the re-emergence of Nazism that they see it everywhere, and are blind to any other threat.
What this means is that, without a seismic shift, there is actually very little that can easily be done about the first two problems. Even if he wanted to, the Chancellor of Germany does not have the authority to change Germany’s basic law, let alone an electoral mandate. And while the Bundestag could just about get Germany out of some of its international treaties, because those treaties underwrite Germany’s international relations, they underwrite the trade her economy needs for survival.
The constitutional problem is broadly similar. All constitutions lack perfect foresight. Of course, it’s true that, when these documents were written, states had no business treating religions differently. But that was before Islamism arrived. Once Islamic migration really began in earnest, the days of procedural neutrality should have ended. And while none of this is to say that peaceful, patriotic Muslims should be targeted, Islamism — as I well know — is plainly different.
We do not yet know whether Mannheim’s second attacker, who stabbed an AfD politician on Tuesday night, was an asylum-seeker. He may have just been an ordinary immigrant, or even a German-born citizen. But if I were a betting woman, I would bet he came in on one of the many schemes designed to help threatened people, in very small numbers, in a previous era. Most conventions around refugees were drawn up just after the Second World War or the Cold War, with those conflicts’ problems in mind. Things are different now, and the change is killing our nations.
What is the cure? It certainly doesn’t involve electing a centre-right government. As the past 14 years in the UK have shown, centre-right governments do nothing. Instead, what is needed is a shift in international and constitutional law, or events like those in Germany will just keep happening until the nations of Europe collapse.
No doubt I’ll write this article again in a year. And the year after that. But if we think big, and enough of us wake up, then one day, I’ll be able to stop. Until then.
❖ Assyrian man tried to stop knife assailant, Mannheim Germany
The Iraqi Christian wanted to stop the attacker – “I got hit on the head”
“I just ran, without fear, without anything. And I just held him,” the eyewitness said to reporters in tears. “I said: God, give me the strength!” as he pushed the attacker down to the ground with his hand. But the attacker fought back. “I got hit on the head,” the visibly distraught man continued, describing the attack, so he let go.
The attacker then stabbed him, the man continued. After the attack, he had to be treated in hospital for THREE stab wounds in the back. But he came to the vigil immediately after his release. A doctor advised him to do this so that he could better process what had happened.
“I’m doing this from the heart,” the man said about his attempt to stop the 25-year-old attacker. “I like to help. I live here. I love Germany.” A companion explained that the man, who did not want to be named, was a Christian, an Aramaean from Iraq.
❖ “I like to help, I live here, I love Germany.” You are very welcome, brave man!
❖ These are people who fit into our culture and love our country. He belongs to the most persecuted group in the world – Christians. Our politicians are partly to blame for the radicalization of this Afghan. Ahmad Mansour has been warning about political Islam for years, he writes books and talks his head off. How was this Afghan able to radicalize unnoticed over the years? Our politicians are naive, they look away and do not recognize reality.
❖ A Christian. One who fled and was rightly given protection. The other – an Islamist Muslim who was not rightly here. Should have been deported to his caliphate in Afghanistan long ago. Nancy Faeser (Federal Minister of the Interior and Community) you were part of this terror.
❖ The right to apply for asylum or refugee status from Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and so-called “Palestine” should have been limited from the outset to the group most persecuted there and most compatible with our values: the Aramaic and Arab Christians. Instead, we have also brought their tormentors into the country.
❖ This brave man is a Christian. Aramaeans are particularly religious.
❖ He fled from exactly what he had to witness in Mannheim and wanted to prevent. People like him are of course welcome!
❖ People who have gotten to know Islam in the countries in which it already rules are often much clearer and more uncompromising in the fight against Islamism. Copts, (true) Iranians and Syrian Christians have already had to suffer the experience of expansive dominance; they have no doubts and no divisions.
❖ The poor man. He fled from Islamists in Iraq only to be stabbed to death by Islamists here. He shows what is going wrong. The wrong people are being allowed into the country and people from abroad who are trying to integrate here and help build Germany have to suffer because of those who come to Germany, hate our culture and only want to enjoy the advantages.
❖ This Iraqi has understood what integration means. It is probably because he is a Christian. Welcome to Germany. We like people like that.
❖ Of course the Aramaean likes living here in Germany. We are actually a Christian country. This makes his fear all the greater that he will soon suffer the same fate as many Christians in the area.
❖ And once again it becomes clear: it is not because of his origins, but because of Islam. The crime statistics should take this into account and not cover it up!
♱ Miracle of The Cross: The Lord Saved The Bishop’s Life By Causing The Jihadi Weapon To Breakdown
♱ Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel’s life was likely saved from death because his attacker’s flick-knife failed to open properly during the stabbing – and the Muslim cut his own THREE fingers off in the botched attack.
Every year, I have to write a version of this article because events like this never seem to stop. Every year, our political leaders promise to do something. And every year, it gets worse. For the past two weeks, it has been the turn of Germany. Next week — who knows?
Last Friday, at about 11:30am, a 25-year-old Afghan went on a knife spree at a rally in Mannheim. He stabbed Michael Stürzenberger, the convener of the rally, along with a policeman and four others, before a second policeman shot him. Two days later, the officer succumbed to his wounds.
We still don’t know everything about the incident. What we do know, though, is that it is a deeply sad — and obvious — metaphor for the way Western countries function. People protest Islamic violence. The press smears them. Islamists attack. The state tries to subdue the protestors. The Islamists continue attacking. Rinse and repeat.
It isn’t even the first time Stürzenberger’s protests have been attacked. He has been assaulted twice before by Islamists, in 2013 and in 2022. Why? Well, according to the mainstream media, he is a far-Right extremist. As Euronews puts it: he has been “previously linked to Pegida, a xenophobic extreme-Right group with a strong neo-Nazi following, prompting an investigation by the German federal state’s Office for the Protection of the Constitution”.
And what did this investigation uncover? Little more than the fact that he’s a relatively normal man who condemns Islamic violence — and who, like many such people, including some of my friends, has now ended up being stabbed. Yet Stürzenberger’s normalcy hasn’t stopped the German legal system from persecuting him. One of his convictions was for sharing a photo on Facebook of a Nazi shaking hands with an Islamic cleric, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. Not a doctored photo. Just a photo. After all, photos reveal facts — but in Germany, even sharing the government’s own statistics can get you a criminal record.
Last week’s attack prompted the standard response from the German political establishment. The Chancellor condemned it. He expressed sadness. His government promises to investigate, to defend “against Islamist terrorism with determination”. But did anyone buy it? Though there are exceptions like Hungary, these attacks seem to happen regardless of national borders, and regardless of whether the country in question has a Left-wing or a Right-wing government.
The more cynical among us are inclined to claim that they keep happening because no one really cares. But that is lazy thinking. Not all of these politicians are feckless monsters, however temporarily gratifying it may feel to say so.
“Not all of these politicians are feckless monsters, however temporarily gratifying it may feel to say so.”
So why do they seem to do nothing? Part of the answer — a significant part of the answer — lies with the cluster of policies and assumptions that all mainstream European countries have written into their rules regarding immigration.
The first concerns treaties. These governments are signatories to international treaties that inadvertently leave them with no option but to leave their borders unprotected and to allow unwanted migrants to stay put. The Geneva Convention on Refugees. The European Court of Human Rights. As long as these are in place, national governments can do little to stop Islamists from entering — even if they wanted to.
The second concerns constitutions. Western nations abide by constitutional laws that leave them with no alternative but to allow the Islamists to recruit operatives and establish networks, mosques, schools and charities devoted to the spread of political Islam. Again, there is nothing they are able to do, because Islam is not singled out in their constitution as a singular cause for concern. If it were, the lawyers for these institutions would sue, saying that it is illegal to treat Islam differently. And, infuriatingly, under the current system, they would be right.
The third concerns perceptions. Our governments assume that anyone — citizen or organisation; journalist, politician or academic — critical of the government’s way of handling Islamism is a dangerous bigot who must be shamed into silence. Maybe such attitudes were forgivable half a century ago, but it is pretty obvious now that there is nothing bigoted about fearing Islamism. Islamists make that clear with increasing regularity. Nonetheless, it is not as if any human is immune to the effects of the echo chamber. The elites swim in a pool where everyone believes that racism underlies opposition to open borders. This is particularly true of Germany’s elites, who are still so focused on stopping the re-emergence of Nazism that they see it everywhere, and are blind to any other threat.
What this means is that, without a seismic shift, there is actually very little that can easily be done about the first two problems. Even if he wanted to, the Chancellor of Germany does not have the authority to change Germany’s basic law, let alone an electoral mandate. And while the Bundestag could just about get Germany out of some of its international treaties, because those treaties underwrite Germany’s international relations, they underwrite the trade her economy needs for survival.
The constitutional problem is broadly similar. All constitutions lack perfect foresight. Of course, it’s true that, when these documents were written, states had no business treating religions differently. But that was before Islamism arrived. Once Islamic migration really began in earnest, the days of procedural neutrality should have ended. And while none of this is to say that peaceful, patriotic Muslims should be targeted, Islamism — as I well know — is plainly different.
We do not yet know whether Mannheim’s second attacker, who stabbed an AfD politician on Tuesday night, was an asylum-seeker. He may have just been an ordinary immigrant, or even a German-born citizen. But if I were a betting woman, I would bet he came in on one of the many schemes designed to help threatened people, in very small numbers, in a previous era. Most conventions around refugees were drawn up just after the Second World War or the Cold War, with those conflicts’ problems in mind. Things are different now, and the change is killing our nations.
What is the cure? It certainly doesn’t involve electing a centre-right government. As the past 14 years in the UK have shown, centre-right governments do nothing. Instead, what is needed is a shift in international and constitutional law, or events like those in Germany will just keep happening until the nations of Europe collapse.
No doubt I’ll write this article again in a year. And the year after that. But if we think big, and enough of us wake up, then one day, I’ll be able to stop. Until then.
☪ Antichrist Turkey’s Genocide of the The Native Assyrian Christians: + 300,000 Massacred
❖ May God comfort the hearts of all of us Assyrians who are greived today by this incident, and the hearts of all Christians affected by it. Whether Orthodox, Coptic, whatever, you are my brothers and sisters and I love you. Muhammad is burning in Jahinnum/Hell, Allah is Shaitan and Pisslam is false.
☪ Antichrist Muslims Calling For Caliphate in Germany
_______
_______
Addis Ethiopia Weblog 