France: Criticism of mRNA Vaccine Will Be Punishable With Up to 3 Yrs Prison + €45,000 Fine

😈 ፋሺዝም በግራኝ ሞግዚት ማክሮን ፈረነሳይ፤ በ ኤም.አር.ኤን.ኤ (mRNA) ክትባት ላይ ትችት የሚሰጥና ተቃውሞ የሚያሰማ እስከ ሦስት አመት በሚደርስ እስራት + € 45,000 ዩሮ ይቀጣል። ጉድ ነው!

💭 New Law Passed In France. Opposition Of The Mrna Injections As A Sectarian Aberration = Upto 3 Yrs Prison + €45,000 Fine

A new criminal offense in France could in future land people in prison who encourage people to withhold appropriate medical treatment (according to “science”). The law was pushed through the National Assembly on Wednesday. Critics call the law “Article Pfizer.”

Without much attention, a law was passed in France on Wednesday that could criminalize resistance to mRNA treatment. Anyone who advises against mRNA or other “medical treatments” that are “ obviously suitable” for treatment based on the current state of medical knowledge can in future be imprisoned in France for up to three years or receive a fine of up to 45,000 euros.

Repression against medical critics

It was a hard-fought issue, but the Macron regime ultimately got its way. Article 4 is central to the new law, which was first deleted but then reinstated. This creates a new criminal offense and criminalizes the “ request to stop or refrain from therapeutic or prophylactic medical treatment” as well as “the request to use practices that are presented as therapeutic or prophylactic ”. This means that any resistance to mRNA treatment (and other corporate medical methods) can be criminalized in the future.

Biologist Annelise Bocquet, for example, is correspondingly shocked. She writes on Wednesday evening: “ To my international friends and colleagues: Today a law was passed in France that describes any opposition to mRNA-LNP injections as a “sectarian aberration.” It is punished with a penalty of up to three years in prison and 45,000 euros.”

The most explosive wording in the law that can be applied to the mRNA critics can be found in paragraph 2:

“ The request to give up or refrain from therapeutic or prophylactic medical treatment is punishable by one year in prison and 15 . 000 euros fine if this task or omission is presented as beneficial to the health of the target persons , although , according to the current state of medical knowledge , it is obviously likely to have serious consequences for them on their physical or physical level , given the illness from which they suffer to have mental health .”

Anti-democratic maneuver

Most opposition factions – with the exception of the Social Democratic Group – saw the law as a prejudgment of so-called “alternative medicine” and a threat to whistleblowers. “ The sincerity of this fight against dangerous sectarian developments must not consist in punishing complementary care practices or the consumption of phytotherapeutic products by law ,” said Jean-François Coulomme from the left-wing alliance “La France insoumise”. Thomas Ménagé from Le Pen’s “Rassemblement national” simply called the law “a development hostile to freedom.”

Initially, the government’s plans failed and Article 4 could be deleted from the law. This immediately resulted in polemics from the government. A politician from Macron’s party then spoke of an “alliance against science” of which he was “ashamed”.

But on Wednesday the government prevailed – with a maneuver typical of the Macron regime. This is how the French parliamentary correspondence reports about it:

One would not have counted on the determination of the government and the majority. On Wednesday, February 14, at the end of the consideration of the bill, the chairman of the Legal Affairs Committee, Sacha Houlié (Renaissance), took the floor in the plenary chamber to request a second consultation, as permitted by Article 101 of the Rules of Procedure of the National Assembly. This states that “a second consultation is legally possible at the request of the government or the lead committee”.

Brigitte Liso has therefore tabled an amendment to restore – and reword – Article 4. Although the rapporteur emphasized that the offense is not fulfilled “if proof of the person’s free and informed consent is provided”, she also made it clear that the new wording introduces an additional dimension in the context of the protection of whistleblowers The aim of the law of December 9, 2016 on transparency, combating corruption and modernizing economic life was. An objective reiterated in the text of the amendment, according to which “information reported or disclosed by a whistleblower under the conditions set out in Article 6” of the previously cited law “does not constitute provocation” within the meaning of Article 4 of the present bill.

This slightly amended draft was adopted in the first reading with 151 votes to 73, virtually without debate.

Florian Philippot, the party leader of “Les Patriots”, a Le Pen splinter, had already warned against such a maneuver by the government a week before this action. He called Article 4 “Pfizer amendment”. He wrote at the time on The National Assembly wants to reintroduce it with the support of the Council of Orders (of course!…), although even the Council of State classifies it as anti-freedom, that’s all!”

Now the Macron regime has implemented the plan and pushed through the “Pfizer amendment”. What is currently being experienced in France’s parliament is “blatant pre-fascism,” an observer based there tells TKP: “Punish, discipline, coerce everywhere.” The Pfizer article is another chapter. Who the new offense is aimed at became clear in the debate in Parliament. “The next pandemic is coming” was an argument that could be heard from the government.

Now the bill goes back to the Senate. There could also be resistance there, but the Macronists have ways to get around this.

______________