The invasion of Europe and America
Posted by addisethiopia on August 25, 2015
Europe is on the verge of descending into utter chaos. Reuters reported that “thousands of migrants stormed across Macedonia’s border on Saturday, overwhelming security forces who threw stun grenades and lashed out with batons before apparently abandoning a bid to stem their flow through the Balkans to western Europe.”
These thousands of Muslim “refugees,” most of them from the jihad hotspots of Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq, have been pouring into Greece and the Balkans in huge numbers for some time now. But they do not, of course, want to stay in Greece, Macedonia and Serbia. They want to reach the European Union: primarily Germany, France and Britain.
More of these “refugees” arrive every day.Media reports of this Muslim invasion focus on the crying women and children, who seem to have been deliberately brought to the front of the crowd. Clearly the vast majority of these “migrants” are men, and in any case, under normal circumstances, wouldn’t you take the women, and especially the children, to the side so that they wouldn’t get hurt in clashes with police? Instead, they are used as human shields.
How very like Hamas. Just as the “Palestinian” terrorists launch attacks from civilian areas to try to provoke civilian casualties they can use to manipulate world opinion, so now the international media obscures the reality of this flood of “refugees” into Europe in an attempt to blunt legitimate concern over it.
This is just emotional manipulation of the vilest kind, as we’ve already seen so many times with the Gaza conflict, the Bosnian civil war, the supposed “genocide” of Muslims in Burma, and so very much more.
Europe (and the U.S. under Obama) are importing jihad. For years, I have warned against the massive Muslim immigration under refugee resettlement programs. What are Muslims fleeing? Shariah law?
Immigration jihad, or hijrah, is the migration or journey of Muhammad and his followers from Mecca to Yathrib, later renamed by him to Medina, in the year 622 CE. It was after the hijrah that Muhammad for the first time became not just a preacher of religious ideas, but a political and military leader. That was what occasioned his new “revelations” exhorting his followers to commit violence against unbelievers. Significantly, the Islamic calendar counts the hijrah, not Muhammad’s birth or the occasion of his first “revelation,” as the beginning of Islam, implying that Islam is not fully itself without a political and military component.
And true to that martial aspect of this immigration, the “refugees” have grown increasingly violent. Nonetheless, the enemedia and compromised government officials maintain that if you disagree with letting all these people into your country, you are a heartless hateful racist bigot. But this is as absurd as it is insidious. Imagine if this logic were applied in daily life, if someone wanted to enter your house, take all your belongings and even move in there. Should you be forced to let them in?
Shouldn’t the governing authorities of every sovereign nation, if they really have the best interests of their nation at heart, have the right to let in who they want into their country, just as anyone can decide who he or she wants to allow into his or her home? Nobody has a “right” to move to a certain country, or to become a citizen of that country, or to receive welfare or some other assistance there – but it seems as though we as a culture and civilization have completely forgotten about these simple facts.
So when all European cities, and even whole countries, start to look the way Paris or London (where, in significant areas of the city, the majority of the population is of foreign extraction and Islam is the dominant religion) look today, will we have “helped” enough? It’s a war being fought throughout many European cities. In Denmark, it’s Muslim armies versus bikers, often classified as “gang violence.”
And at the rate President Obama is importing these same Muslim communities, we can expect the same war in the streets. Obama is importing whole Muslim communities from jihad nations, while immigration authorities single out Christians who are fleeing Islamic slaughter for attrition and harassment. In 2016, the number of Muslim refugees coming to the U.S. from Syria is expected to quadruple.
Are there no officials in Europe or America who love their homelands enough to stop ignoring the obvious consequences of all this?
The Third Muslim Invasion
They came in the early eighth century across the Straits of Gibraltar, unleashing terror and carnage across Iberia “like a desolating storm.” They were stopped deep inside today’s France, at Tours, by Charles Martel in 732. They kept attacking Europe throughout the Middle Ages, but their next sustained assault was at her vulnerable southeastern flank, taking advantage of Byzantium’s weakened state after the infamous Fourth Crusade. They conquered Constantinople and destroyed the Christian nations of Bulgaria, Serbia, Hungary. They were finally stopped at the gates of Vienna on September 11 / 12, 1683.
Europe seemed safe over the ensuing 250 years of unprecedented demographic, scientific, technological, and geopolitical advance. The “sick man on the Bosphorus” was reduced to a mere object of European imperial ambitions, while “Arabia,” irrelevant to the civilized world, remained stuck in its primitive ways.
Europe attempted suicide with the Great War, sealed with its sequel in 1939-45. Her subsequent material recovery was a mirage. Dechristianized and focused on the need for cheap labor regardless of its source, she imported millions of Muslim immigrants in the 1960’s and 70’s—Turks to Germany, Pakistanis to Britain, Algerians to France, and a mix of them all to Benelux, Scandinavia, Austria. A generation later a multimillion Muslim diaspora was well established throughout the old continent. Steeped in the Islamic ethos regardless of ethnic origin, it refused integration and created its own infidel-free zones in the French banlieus, Yorkshire’s industrial cities, and Berlin’s suburbs.
The process has been assisted by Europe’s political elite. In recent years, for example, a Dutch justice minister announced that the Muslim demand for no-go zones and sharia in Holland was perfectly legitimate, while a Swedish government minister declared that “we must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.” Similar examples are too numerous to mention. By last January, Europe was more than ready to follow the Charlie Hebdo massacre with a wave of morbid self-examination and shrill warnings against “Islamophobia.”
The Third Muslim Invasion of Europe is entering its mature stage by sea, just like the previous two onslaughts. The difference is threefold. The invaders are not armed warriors but “asylum seekers.” They can count on a massive infrastructure of Islamic centers and coreligionists to welcome them. And there is no political will to resist them.
Europe’s southern maritime frontier is as porous as America’s on the Rio Grande. Last year 220,000 African and Asian illegal immigrants landed on northern Mediterranean shores. None have been sent back. E.U. border-agency chief Fabrice Leggeri says that up to a million are currently poised to leave Libya alone. It is an eminently Muslim invasion: African Christians making the crossing, a minority, are routinely thrown overboard by their jihadist-minded fellow passengers.