A Glimpse into a Potential Horrific Scenario Surrounding 9/11, 2016

Another Benghazi — another 9/11? A horrible scenario (we hope the writer is wrong) for the days to come, beginning, perhaps, around September 11, 2016:

1) Turkey plans to Stab Putin in the back.

2) Turkey will seize the nukes, but only after every one of the Marines guarding them has been killed.

3) Turkey has the codes to use those nukes already given to them by someone from our government.

4) Turkey will use a “US” marked F-16 to nuke the Russian military port in the Black sea, while simultaneously striking Russian bases in Syria with other “US” aircraft and Nukes.

5) Turkey will then invade Syria, Cyprus, and Greece, while Isis launches an attack into Jordan.

6) Erdogan will claim direct ancestry to Mohammed and announce only he is the Caliph of the New Muslim empire, and ISIS will swear allegiance to him.

7) This will all happen in the next few months before the election.

8) Bill Clinton will die of “natural” causes before the election, Hillary will be forced to quit.

9) Trump will be eliminated from the race by an unlawful act.

10)The US election will be suspended because of World War III.

11) Europe with explode into chaos when Muslim immigrants start mass executions that will make what happened to the yazidis seem like a dry run.

12) Jerusalem will be nuked by Turkey.

13) Nationwide BLM riots will strike the US in October.

14) the US economy will fall apart from forces without and within.

15) Russian hackers will delete as many bank and financial records worldwide as they can in the space of 24 hours before they use nukes to destroy the electrical grids of the US, Europe, and of course Turkey.

16) China will nuke Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, and The Philippines, before invading most of asia.

17) Australia will be zorched by EMP’s, so will New Zealand.

18) India and Pakistan will go nuclear.

19) Iran will nuke what’s left of Israel before they hit Saudi Arabia.

20) Saudi Nukes will erase Iran.

— US Nuclear Weapons in Turkey at Risk of Seizure by Terrorists, Hostile Forces

Islamist Nightmare Scenarios

Nightmare No.1: Nuclear attack on the West Status: Could easily happen in 21st century

Bad as 9/11 was, it made a previously unlikely nightmare scenario far more real: If the terrorists had a nuclear weapon, they would clearly use it immediately against a western city. As soon as they get such weapons, they will be used. Apocalyptic stateless terrorists cannot be deterred, as terror states like the Soviet Union were.

And nuclear weapons continue to spread. Now the butchers of North Korea have nuclear weapons. While their impoverished people starved to death in a state-caused famine, these butchers spent billions to construct nuclear weapons to threaten the free countries of South Korea and Japan. And the aggressive, Jew-hating, fascist state of Iran seems to be next. Who is going to stop every genocidal tyrant, Islamic fascist, and murderous armed group on the planet getting nukes?

Only America tries to stop this. The UN does nothing. China, Russia and Pakistan help it along. The rest of the world will not take this issue seriously until a western city is destroyed.

Nuclear attack on the West will mean the end of the Islamic world

The Islamists are playing with fire. If their attacks go too far – if there are WMD attacks on western cities – if the west starts to feel an actual existential threat – the Islamists may receive nuclear retaliation. They really are playing with fire.

And no, saying that does not mean I want that to happen. This is why this page is called “Nightmares”.

• The New Arab Way of War by Peter Layton: “there have been many instances in Western history where patience has been exhausted suddenly and merciless, ruthless responses undertaken. The Arab way of war could yet reap this whirlwind for the Middle East if attacks by assassins go too far. History suggests this line will not be known, or even articulated, until after it is crossed.“
• Postmodern War by Victor Davis Hanson – It is extremely difficult for America to fight this enemy in this age of global news, but: “In our present context, all our concern about American combat casualties would vanish should there be another mass murder similar to 9/11. Like ancient man, postmodern man is hardwired to survive, and thus really will use his full arsenal when faced with the alternative of extinction. Should we lose the stock exchange or the White House, there would be almost no calls for restraint against states that harbored or aided the perpetrators”
• The “Belmont Club” by Richard Fernandez has some analysis of how the world will respond if there is nuclear attack by Islamists:
  • Are suicide attacks the ‘ultimate weapon’? says that Islamism’s features – suicidal, cannot be deterred, committed to our destruction no matter how we appease it – are strategic weaknesses because they force its enemies to engage in total war against it. Unless it is defeated, Islamism will eventuallyforce some country into using nuclear weapons against it. – “The natural outcome of the kamikazes was the atomic bomb over Hiroshima. Nothing else would do. … And the eventual reaction of nuclear-armed Israel, Russia and India to the unlimited slaughter of their populations does not bear thinking upon. And it will not be surrender, but rather something else.”
  • Et in Arcadia Ego Sum – Islamism forces its enemies to fight to the death, since it explicitly tells them they will die if they surrender.
  • The Three Conjectures (and postscript):
    1. Conjecture 1: Terrorism has lowered the nuclear threshold.
    2. Conjecture 2: Attaining WMDs will destroy Islam. “A catastrophic outcome for Islam is guaranteed” [once Islamists acquire WMDs].
    3. Conjecture 3: The War on Terror is the ‘Golden Hour’ – the final chance. “It is supremely ironic that the survival of the Islamic world should hinge on an American victory in the War on Terror, the last chance to prevent that terrible day … It follows that the War on Terror must not fail. Not if mankind is to live; not if the Muslim world is going to survive.”
  • More discussion here and here.

Continue reading…

UPDATE

WAR?? TURKEY Threatens US: “Give Turkey Your Nuclear Weapons at Incirlik Air Base or We Will Take Them!”

Here’s something the American establishment media isn’t touching with a ten-foot pole…

The leading Islamic newspaper in Turkey – and official government mouthpiece – has Tweeted the announcement that the United States must give Turkey its NUCLEAR WEAPONS at Incirlik air base or Turkey will take them.

This is CONFIRMED by the Washington Point and other news media through their reporters Tweeting too as shown below:

This information is being broadcast on television inside Turkey.

This could be the single most important news story of all our lifetimes and it is developing very fast. If Turkey tries to proceed, it means immediate war with the United States and NATO.

__

Population Control Tool: Famine?

 

• The Haig-Kissinger depopulation policy, by Lonnie Wolfe

Special Report EIR (Executive Intelligence Review) March 10, 1981

Investigations by EIR have uncovered a planning apparatus operating outside the control of the White House whose sole purpose is to reduce the world’s population by 2 billion people through war, famine, disease and any other means necessary. This apparatus, which includes various levels of the government is determining U.S. foreign policy. In every political hotspot — El Salvador, the so-called arc of crisis in the Persian Gulf, Latin America, Southeast Asia and in Africa- the goal of U.S. foreign policy is population reduction. The targeting agency for the operation is the National Security Council’s Ad Hoc Group on Population Policy. Its policy-planning group is in the U.S. State Department’s Office of Population Affairs, established in 1975 by Henry Kissinger. This group drafted the Carter administration’s Global 2000 document, which calls for global population reduction, and the same apparatus is conducting the civil war in El Salvador as a conscious depopulation project.

“There is a single theme behind all our work-we must reduce population levels,” said Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the State Department’s Office of Population Affairs (OPA). “Either they [governments] do it our way, through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran, or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it “The professionals,” said Ferguson, “aren’t interested in lowering population for humanitarian reasons. That sounds nice. We look at resources and environmental constraints. We look at our strategic needs, and we say that this country must lower its population-or else we will have trouble.

So steps are taken. El Salvador is an example where our failure to lower population by simple means has created the basis for a national security crisis. The government of El Salvador failed to use our programs to lower their population. Now they get a civil war because of it…. There will be dislocation and food shortages. They still have too many people there.”

Civil wars are somewhat drawn-out ways to reduce population, the OPA official added. “The quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like in Africa or through disease like the Black Death,” all of which might occur in El Salvador. Ferguson’s OPA monitors populations in the Third World and maps strategies to reduce them. Its budget for FY 1980 was $190 million; for FY 198l, it will be $220 million. The Global 2000 report calls for doubling that figure. The sphere of Kissinger In 1975, OPA was brought under a reorganized State Department Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental, and Scientific Affairs– a body created by Henry Kissinger.

The agency was assigned to carry out the directives of the NSC Ad Hoc Group. According to an NSC spokesman, Kissinger initiated both groups after discussion with leaders of the Club of Rome during the 1974 population conferences in Bucharest and Rome. The Club of Rome, controlled by Europe’s black nobility, is the primary promotion agency for the genocidal reduction of world population levels. The Ad Hoc Group was given “high priority” by the Carter administration, through the intervention of National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski and Secretaries of State Cyrus Vance and Edmund Muskie.

According to OPA expert Ferguson, Kissinger initiated a full about-face on U.S. development policy toward the Third World. “For a long time,” Ferguson stated, “people here were timid” They listened to arguments from Third World leaders that said that the best contraceptive was economic reform and development. So we pushed development programs, and we helped create a population time bomb. “We are letting people breed like flies without allowing for natural causes to keep population down. We raised the birth survival rates, extended life-spans by lowering death rates, and did nothing about lowering birth rates.

That policy is finished. We are saying with Global 2000 and in real policy that you must lower population rates. Population reduction and control is now our primary policy objective- then you can have some development.”Accordingly, the Bureau of Oceans, International Environmental, and Scientific Affairs has consistently blocked industrialization policies in the Third World, denying developing nations access to nuclear energy technology–the policies that would enable countries to sustain a growing population. According to State Department sources, and Ferguson himself, Alexander Haig is a “firm believer” in population control.

“We will go into a country,” said Ferguson, “and say, here is your goddamn development plan. Throw it out the window. Start looking at the size of your population and figure out what must be done to reduce it.”If you don’t like that, if you don’t want to choose to do it through planning, then you’ll have an El Salvador or an Iran, or worse, a Cambodia.”According to an NSC spokesman, the United States now shares the view of former World Bank President Robert McNamara that the “population crisis” is a greater threat to U.S. national security interests than “nuclear annihilation.” “Every hot spot in the world corresponds to a population crisis point,” said Ferguson who would rename Brzezinski’s arc of crisis doctrine the “arc of population crisis.”

This is corroborated by statements in the NSC Ad Hoc Group’s April 1980 report. There is “an increased potential for social unrest, economic and political instability, mass migration and possible international conflicts over control of land and resources,” says the NSC report. It then cites “demographic pressures” as key to understanding “examples of recent warfare in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, El Salvador. Honduras, and Ethiopia, and the growing potential forinstability in such places as Turkey, the Philippines, Central America, Iran, and Pakistan.” Through extraordinary efforts, the Ad Hoc Group and OPA estimate that they may be able to keep a billion people from being born through contraceptive programs.

But as the Ad Hoc Group’s report states, the best efforts of the Shah of Iran to institute “clean programs” of birth control failed to make a significant dent in the country’s birth rate. The promise of jobs, through an ambitious industrialization program, encouraged migration toward “overcrowded cities” like Teheran. Now under Ayatollah Khomeini, the “clean programs” have been dismantled. The government may make progress because it has a program “to induce up to half of Teheran’s 6 million residents to relocate, as well as possible measures to keep rural migrants from moving to the cities.” Behind the back of the President Ferguson and others involved with the OPA and NSC group maintain that the United States will continue a foreign policy based on a genocidal reduction of the world’s population.

“We have a network in place of co-thinkers in the government,” said the OPA case officer. “We keep going, no matter who is in the White House.” But Ferguson reports that the “White House” does not really understand what they are saying and that the President “thinks that population policy means how do we speed up population increase. “As long as no one says differently,” said Ferguson, “we will continue to do our jobs. “

 

________________________________________