France on the Verge of Total Collapse

France did not perceive it at the time, but it placed itself in a trap, and the trap is now closing.

• In the 1970s, the Palestinians began to use international terrorism, and France chose to accept this terrorism so long as France was not affected. At the same time, France welcomed mass-immigration from the Arab-Muslim world, evidently as part of a Muslim wish to expand Islam. France’s Muslim population has since grown in numbers while failing to assimilate.
• Polls show that one-third of French Muslims want the full application of Islamic sharia law. They also show that the overwhelming majority of French Muslims support jihad, and especially jihad against Israel, a country they would like to see erased from the face of earth.
• “It is better to leave than flee.” — Sammy Ghozlan, President of the National Bureau of Vigilance against Anti-Semitism. He was later mugged, and his car was torched. He left.
• Villiers also mentions the presence in “no-go zones” of thousands of weapons of war. He adds that weapons will probably not even have to be used; the Islamists have already won.
• Originally, France’s dreams might have been of displacing America as a world power, accessing inexpensive oil, business deals with oil-rich Islamic states, and the prayer of no domestic terrorism.

France is in turmoil. “Migrants” arriving from Africa and the Middle East sow disorder and insecurity in many cities. The huge slum commonly known as the “jungle of Calais” has just been dismantled, but other slums are being created each day. In eastern Paris, streets have been covered with corrugated sheets, oilcloth and disjointed boards. Violence is commonplace. France’s 572 “no-go zones,” officially defined as “sensitive urban areas”, continue to grow, and police officers who approach them often suffer the consequences. Recently, a police car drove into an ambush and was torched while the police were prevented from getting out. If attacked, police officers are told by their superiors to flee rather than retaliate. Many police officers, angry at having to behave like cowards, have organized demonstrations. No terrorist attacks have taken place since the slaughter of a priest in Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray on July 26, 2016, but intelligence services see that jihadists have returned from the Middle East and are ready to act, and that riots may break out anywhere, any time, on any pretext.

Although overwhelmed by a domestic situation it barely controls, the French government still intervenes in the world affairs: a “Palestinian state” is still its favorite cause, Israel its favorite scapegoat.

Last Spring, even though both France and the Palestinian territories were in terrible shape, French Foreign Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault anyway declared that it was “urgent” to relaunch the “peace process” and create a Palestinian state. France therefore convened an international conference, held in Paris on June 3. Neither Israel nor the Palestinians were invited to it. The conference was a flop. It concluded with a vapid statement about the “imperative necessity” to go “forward.”

France did not stop there. The government then decided to organize a new conference in December. This time, with Israel and the Palestinians. Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, noting that Israel does not need intermediaries, refused the invitation. Palestinian leaders accepted. Saeb Erekat, the Palestinian Authority spokesman congratulated France, adding, not surprisingly, that the Palestinian Authority had “suggested” the idea to the French.

Now Donald Trump is the U.S. president-elect, and Newt Gingrich is likely to play a key role in the Trump Administration. Gingrich said a few years ago that there is no such a thing as a Palestinian people, and added last week that settlements are in no way an obstacle to peace. As such, the December conference looks as if it might be another failure.

French diplomats nevertheless are working with Palestinian officials on a UN resolution to recognize a Palestinian State inside the “1967 borders” (the 1949 armistice lines), but without any peace treaty. They are apparently hoping that outgoing U.S. President Barack Obama will not use the American veto at the Security Council, allowing the passage of the resolution. It is not certain at all that Barack Obama will want to end his presidency on a gesture so openly subversive. It is almost certain that France will fail there too. Again.

For many years, France seems to have built its entire foreign policy on aligning itself with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC): 56 Islamic countries plus the Palestinians. Originally, France’s dreams might have been of displacing America as a world power, accessing inexpensive oil, business deals with oil-rich Islamic states, and the prayer of no domestic terrorism. All four have been washouts. It is also obvious that France has more urgent problems to solve.

France persists because it is desperately trying to limit problems that probably cannot be solved.

In the 1950s, France was different from what it is now. It was a friend of Israel. The “Palestinian cause” did not exist. The war in Algeria was raging, and a large majority of French politicians would not even have shaken hands with unrepentant terrorists.

Everything changed with the end of the Algerian war. Charles de Gaulle handed Algeria over to a terrorist movement called the National Liberation Front. He then proceeded to create a strategic reorientation of the France’s foreign policy, unveiling what he called the “Arab policy of France.”

France signed trade and military agreements with various Arab dictatorships. To seduce its new friends, it eagerly adopted an anti-Israel policy. When, in the 1970s, terrorism in the form of airplane hijackings was invented by the Palestinians, and with the murder of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics, “the Palestinians” all at once became a “sacred cause” and a useful tool for leverage in the Arab world, France, adopting the “cause,” became rigidly pro-Palestinian.

The Palestinians began to use international terrorism, and France chose to accept this terrorism so long as France was not affected. At the same time, France welcomed mass-immigration from the Arab-Muslim world, evidently as part of a Muslim wish to expand Islam. The Muslim population has since grown in numbers, while failing to assimilate.

France did not perceive it at the time, but it placed itself in a trap, and the trap is now closing.

France’s Muslim population seems anti-French in terms of Judeo-Christian, Enlightenment values, and pro-French only to the extent that France submits to the demands of Islam. As France’s Muslims are also pro-Palestinian, theoretically there should have been no problem. But France underestimated the effects of the rise of extremist Islam in the Muslim world and beyond.

More and more, French Muslims consider themselves Muslim first. Many claim that the West is at war with Islam; they see France and Israel as part of the West, so they are at war with them both. They see that France is anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian, but they also see that several French politicians maintain ties with Israel, so they likely think that France is not anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian enough.

They see that France tolerates Palestinian terrorism, and seem not to understand why France would fight Islamic terrorism in other places.

To please its Muslims, the French government may believe it has no choice other than to be as pro-Palestinian and as anti-Israel as possible — even though it looks as if this policy is failing badly in the polls.

The French government undoubtedly sees that it cannot prevent what increasingly looks like a looming disaster. This disaster is already taking place.

Perhaps France’s current government is hoping that it might delay the disaster a bit and avoid a civil war. Perhaps, they might hope, the “no go zones” will not explode — at least on their watch.

France today has six million Muslims, 10% of its population, and the percentage is growing. Polls show that one-third of French Muslims want the full application of Islamic sharia law. They also show that the overwhelming majority of French Muslims support jihad, and especially jihad against Israel, a country they would like to see erased from the face of earth.

The leading French Muslim organization, the Union of Islamic Organizations of France, is the French branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, a movement that should be listed as a terrorist organization for its open wishes to overthrow Western governments.

The Muslim Brotherhood is primarily financed by Qatar, a country that invests heavily in France — and that has the comfort of its very own U.S. airbase.

Jews are leaving France in record numbers, and these departures do not stop. Sammy Ghozlan, President of the National Bureau of Vigilance against Anti-Semitism, repeated for many years that, “It is better to leave than flee.” He was mugged. His car was torched. He left, and now lives in Israel.

The rest of the French population clearly sees the extreme seriousness of what is happening. Some of them are angry and in a state of revolt; others seem resigned to the worst: an Islamist takeover of Europe.

The next French elections will take place in May 2017. French President François Hollande has lost all credibility and has no chance of being reelected. Whoever comes to power will have a difficult task.

The French seem to have lost confidence in Nicolas Sarkozy, so they will probably choose between Marine Le Pen, Alain Juppé or François Fillon.

Marine Le Pen is the candidate of the far-right National Front.

Alain Juppé is the mayor of Bordeaux, and often campaigns in the company of Tareq Oubrou, imam of the city. Until recently, Tareq Oubrou was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Alain Juppé seems to believe that the present disorder will calm down if France fully submits.

François Fillon will probably be the moderate-right candidate. He recently said that “Islamic sectarianism” creates “problems in France.” He also said that if a Palestinian State is not created very soon, Israel will be “the main threat to world peace.”

Three years ago, the French philosopher Alain Finkielkraut published a book, The Unhappy Identity (L’identité malheureuse), describing the dangers inherent in the Islamization of France and the major disorders that stem from it. Juppé chose a campaign slogan intended to contradict Finkielkraut: “The Happy Identity“.

Since the publication of Alain Finkielkraut’s book, other pessimistic books have been published that became best-sellers in France. In October 2014, columnist Eric Zemmour published The French Suicide (Le suicide français). A few weeks ago, he published another book, A Five-Year Term for Nothing (Un quinquennat pour rien). He describes what he sees happening to France: “invasion, colonization, explosion.”

Zemmour defines the arrival of millions of Muslims in France during the last five decades as an invasion, and the recent arrival of hordes of migrants as the continuation of that invasion. He depicts the creation of “no-go zones” as the creation of Islamic territories on French soil and an integral part of a colonization process.

He writes that the eruptions of violence that spread are signs of an imminent explosion; that sooner or later, revolt will gain ground.

Another book, Will the Church Bells Ring Tomorrow? (Les cloches sonneront-elles encore demain?), was recently published by a former member of the French government, Philippe de Villiers.

Villiers notes the disappearance of churches in France, and their replacement by mosques. He also mentions the presence in “no-go zones” of thousands of weapons of war (AK-47 assault rifles, Tokarev pistols, M80 Zolja anti-tank weapons, etc). He adds that weapons will probably not even have to be used — the Islamists have already won.

In his new book, Will the Church Bells Ring Tomorrow?, Philippe de Villiers notes the disappearance of churches in France, and their replacement by mosques. Pictured above: On August 3, French riot police dragged a priest and his congregation from the church of St Rita in Paris, prior to its scheduled demolition. Front National leader Marine Le Pen said in fury: “And what if they built parking lots in the place of Salafist mosques, and not of our churches?” (Image source: RT video screenshot)

On November 13, 2016, France marked the first anniversary of the Paris attacks. Plaques were unveiled every place where people were killed. The plaques read: “In memory of the injured and murdered victims of the attacks.” No mention was made of jihadist barbarity. In the evening, the Bataclan Theater reopened with a concert by Sting. The last song of the concert was “Insh’ Allah”: “if Allah wills.” The Bataclan management prevented two members of the US band Eagles of Death Metal — who were on stage when the attack started — from entering the concert. A few weeks after the attack, Jesse Hughes, lead singer of the group, had dared to criticize the Muslims involved. The Bataclan’s director said about Hughes, “There are things you cannot forgive.”

Source

— Two Dead as Gunman Storms Catholic Monk Retirement Home in France

__

Judge Jeanine: Do You Want Political Correctness Or Truth?

— Clinton Death List’: 33 Most Intriguing Cases Of ‘coincidental, Accidental’ And ‘suicidal’ Deaths

__

BBC Scrubs ‘Ali’ From Munich Killer’s Name On TV, In Articles, AND On Social Media

The BBC has unilaterally chosen not to report the Munich attacker’s full name, in what appears to be an attempt to scrub any Muslim or Islamic heritage link to its coverage of the incident. 

Most sources at this point suggest that Ali David Sonboly – the Munich attacker who targeted children and killed nine yesterday – is not connected to radical Islam, but the BBC has gone to extraordinary lengths to try to keep any reference to his heritage out of its coverage, opting to name him only as “David Sonboly”.

Other news organisations including the Wall Street Journal, Independent, Daily Mail, and Sky News named the attacker as “Ali David Sonboly” or “David Ali Sonboly”. CNN even referred to him simply as “Ali Sonboly”.

But the BBC had different ideas, opting to refer to him in their online news coverage, national and international broadcast coverage, and on social media (above) as “David Sonboly”.

At 3pm UK time on Saturday, the BBC made reference to the killer as Ali Sonboly. Within one hour however, the BBC had changed its references to the now dead culprit to “David Sonboly”. At 6:31pm, the news bulletin on the BBC News Channel referred to him as “David Sonboly” though at 6:32pm their correspondent in Germany referred to him as “David Ali Sonboly”.

Source

— BBC ‘Fixes’ Munich Killer Article Following Breitbart Expose Of Muslim Name Cover Up

— Media shielding Islam from connection to terror

— The Munich Massacre Is A Complete Coverup. The Munich Shooter’s Facebook Including His Family Background Shows He Is NOT Iranian But A Syrian Islamist Pro Turkey

__

No More! After Nice, Let’s Stop The Nonsense

No more flags of foreign countries posted on Facebook in a spirit of solidarity. No more empathic Twitter hashtags. No more empty statements by heads of government declaring that “the terrorists have failed in their effort to turn us against one another.” No more equally empty statements by other heads of government expressing their own country’s support for “our ally in its time of grief.” No more calls for love in the face of hate, or candlelight processions as a response to murder. No more clicking of tongues and shaking of heads over the horrible loss of life—as if people had died in a one-off natural disaster, a hurricane or tornado or tsunami—followed, after a few days, by a return to normal. Until the next time, of course.

No more attempts to psychologically analyze every new jihadist—to probe his troubled family or professional life in an attempt to figure out what “turned him to violence and extremism.” No more reflexive reassurances that “this has nothing to do with Islam,” that a handful of bad guys have “hijacked” a “peaceful” faith, and that “the great majority of the world’s 1.5 billion Muslims are, of course, peace-loving people who utterly reject this kind of action.” No more slick pivoting to the subject of gun control, or American homophobia, or whatever other diversion seems useful under the specific circumstances. No more blaming of Europeans’ supposed failure to accept or embrace or integrate or employ Muslims, or of Muslims’ alleged poverty or hopelessness or frustration or alienation.

No more hand-wringing by journalists, as they stand mere yards from the bodies of the dead, about the possible “backlash” against Muslims (which never really materializes). No more declarations by U.S. officials that the mere mention of Islam in connection with Islamic terrorism is “dangerous” and “counterproductive” because it “alienates” the Muslim allies and Muslim communities whose help we need in fighting this problem that we dare not properly name. No more respectful TV interviews with representatives of “Muslim civil-rights organizations” that have been proven over and over again to be fronts for terrorism.

No more outrageous lies by government and media that, almost fifteen years after 9/11, keep so many Americans so outrageously in the dark about the world in which we live now. No more of the despicable day-to-day efforts by the same actors to keep those Americans who do get it in line, to instill in them an unholy fear that, if they dare to address the problem honestly, they’ll be thrust forever out into the dark—beyond the realm of decent society, unacceptable, unemployable, unfriendable. No more societal tyranny by those who (because they’re cowardly, or feel powerless, or have no sense of responsibility to preserve the precious gift of freedom that their own forebears fought and died for and have bequeathed them, or are, inconceivably, unconcerned about the world their own children and grandchildren will inhabit) treat as enemies not those who seek to destroy them but those who dare to speak the truth about it.

No more ignorance. A couple of weeks ago, Adam Carolla recorded his podcast—one of the most popular on the Internet—before an Amsterdam audience. Carolla, an Angeleno, asked locals about life in the Netherlands. They painted a thoroughly rosy picture. He asked about religion. They depicted a near-utopian secular country free of reactionary faith. Poof! Down the memory hole went Pim Fortuyn, Theo Van Gogh, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Geert Wilders. And Carolla didn’t challenge any of it. Then, just the other day, in an interview on Joe Rogan’s podcast (which is even bigger than Carolla’s), gay conservative Milo Yiannopoulos served up some basic facts that everybody in the U.S. would know by now if the mainstream media were doing its job—facts about the levels of Muslim rape in Sweden, about the scale of antigay animus in Muslim communities, and about the systematic efforts by European governments to obscure these and other ticklish matters. Rogan, who is no fool, and who has interviewed hundreds of people in an effort to educate himself about the world, was shocked by all of it. (“Wow! Wow! Wow!”)

In the years after 9/11, major acts of Islamic terrorism in the West seemed to come along every year or so, leaving plenty of time in between to go back to pretending that everything was fine and to resume mouthing benign platitudes. Now they’re happening so often, one right on top of the other, that we can hardly keep track of them. The only upside is that it’s getting harder and harder to maintain that pretense.

The time for shock is over. The time for heaping up flowers and candles and stuffed animals at the sites of atrocities is over. The lies and ignorance and cravenness must end, and the simple facts must be faced. The free, civilized West has, for years now, been the target of a war of conquest—a war waged in many forms (of which terrorism is only one) by adherents of a religion that preaches submission, intolerance, and brutality, and our leaders and media, with few exceptions, continue to play a game whose fatuity, fecklessness, and pusillanimity have become increasingly clear. After Nice, no more.

Source

__

SHOCK COVER: ‘Islamic Rape of Europa’ – Polish Mag Shows Brutal Attack by Migrants

My Note: Battle of Vienna: September 11^th – 12^th, 1683 – it was Ethiopia’s New Year’s Day – in an open battle before Vienna, the Ottoman Turks were defeated, The Chief Commander of the army that rescued Vienna was the Polish King, Jan Sobieski. As Europe’s refugee crisis is escalating from tragedy to farce, could Poland once again save the wicked Europeans? Notice, they will use force in the Mediterranean to block “Black Africans” from reaching Europe, but they will send money and vessels to pick up Syrians, Iraqis and Afghans in the Aegean Sea. It’s obvious that their agenda is to import only Asian Muslims or non-Christian Africans. Number of years between Tuesday, 11 September 1683 (Julian calendar) and Sunday, 11 September 2016 (Gregorian calendar) is equal to exact 333 years. 666 = evil, hence 333 = half evil. Note this coming date!

One of Poland’s most popular weekly magazines has splashed a graphic depiction of the rape of Europe’s women by migrants on its front cover. The image may be one of the most politically incorrect illustrations of the migrant crisis to date.

While Poland is generally much more relaxed about expressing itself than the self censoring tendencies of western and northern Europe, the cover of the latest wSieci (The Network) conservative magazine has already prompted reaction just 24 hours after release, being beamed around the continent by social media.

Featuring a personification of Europa being pawed at by dark hands — what the German media would perhaps euphemistically term “southern” or “Mediterranean” — the headline decries the “Islamic Rape of Europe”.

Making perfectly clear the intention of the edition, the edition features articles titled ‘Does Europe Want to Commit Suicide?’ and ‘The Hell of Europe’. The news-stand blurb declares: “In the new issue of the weekly Network, a report about what the media and Brussels elite are hiding from the citizens of the European Union”.

Opening the cover article, Aleksandra Rybinska writes: “The people of old Europe after the events of New Year’s Eve in Cologne painfully realised the problems arising from the massive influx of immigrants. The first signs that things were going wrong, however, were there a lot earlier. They were still ignored or were minimised in significance in the name of tolerance and political correctness”.

Outlining the fundamental differences between eastern Islam and western Christianity — “culture, architecture, music, gastronomy, dress” — the editorial explains these two worlds have been at war “over the last 14 centuries” and the world is now witnessing a colossal “clash of two civilisations in the countries of old Europe”. This clash is brought by Muslims who come to Europe and “carry conflict with the Western world as part of the collective consciousness”, as the journalist marks the inevitability of conflict between native Europeans and their new guests.

The collapse of the West in the face of this “Islamic rape” was not inevitable though, as Rybinska quoted British historian Arnold Toynbee: “Civilisations die from suicide, not by murder”.

Underlining the element of choice Europe has had in accepting the migrant crisis, the article cites the early signs of extreme violence perpetrated by migrants — in this case on each other. Recalling an asylum centre riot in Germany also reported on by Breitbart London in August where inmates part-demolished their own taxpayer funded homes because of a dispute over the Koran and attacked police officers while screaming “Allahu Akhbar”, Ms. Rybinska also recounted the fates of Christian asylum seekers beaten by their Muslim counterparts.

The article lists dozens of recorded sex attacks from the past few weeks, often visited upon under-age Europeans, but it is not just migrants who come in for criticism from wSieci. The magazine also had strong words for German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who it accuses of listening more to the German industrial lobby which it claims campaigns for cheap labour from outside the European Union.

As a feature begging the question ‘Does Europe Want to Commit Suicide’ concludes, “There is concern that European leaders have too late drawn the obvious conclusions, and some of them feel self-loathing”. “Europe is an oasis of prosperity and peace” compared to Africa and the Middle East, it contends, but the arrival of “millions” of cultural Muslims will “shock and undermine Europe”. The blame for this, the article lays firmly at the feet of Mrs. Merkel.

FAZ Caricature Mocks Cologne Sex Victims

On the front page of the February 13, 2016, edition of “The Frankfurter Allgemeiner Zeitung” a caricature of “Greser &Lenz” can be seen there with the headline “Day of the Lovers” context taken from “Valentine’s Day”.

In the caricature, a couple in love on a sofa can be recognized in a heart-shaped golden frame, she is blond and sitting on his lap, he is dark-haired with a black mustache – apparently a bi-national couple, as the names Chantal and Mustafa also imply. This is not especially funny, and could also be understood with a little good will as a lightly ironic play on the “culture of welcome.” However, there is unfortunately a speech bubble tied with the couple with the following content: “We met each other on New Year’s Eve in Cologne and want to get married”!

I am afraid that the caricature duo couldn’t laugh enough over its cynical incidence. And apparently, this “serenity” was apparently shared by the FAZ editors responsible for the textual and visual formation of the front page. Wasn’t anyone who took part in this moral low aware that this bubble text is a slap in the face of all those women who were sexually abused in Cologne and elsewhere on New Year’s Eve night, who were unwillingly groped, offended in their dignity and most basely humiliated? New Year’s Eve in Cologne was no market for nuptials but rather a horror for hundreds of women, whether blonde or brunette.

Source

Man Arrested in Scotland for Facebook Posts About Refugees

The Facebook posts in question, which were not released to the media, allegedly concerned comments about Syrian refugees from Rothersay, on the Scottish Island of Bute, where several refugee families have settled as part of the UK government’s settlement program.

A spokesman from the the Dunoon police station in Argyll said, “I hope that the arrest of this individual sends a clear message that Police Scotland will not tolerate any form of activity which could incite hatred and provoke offensive comments on social media.

Source

__

‘Little’ Great Britain: Christian Worker Loses Her Job After Being Targeted by Islamic Extremists

Nohad Halawi, who worked at Heathrow Airport, is suing her former employers for unfair dismissal, claiming that she and other Christian staff at the airport were victims of systematic harassment because of their religion.

She claims that she was told that she would go to Hell for her religion, that Jews were responsible for the September 11th terror attacks, and that a friend was reduced to tears having been bullied for wearing a cross.

Continue reading…

____________________________________

ይሉኝታ፡ የዜና ማሰራጫዎች በሽታ

የወቅቱን የዓለማችንን ሁኔታ በቅርብ ለሚታዘብና አገራቱንም በደንብ ተዘዋውሮ ለመመልከት አጋጣሚው ያለው ሁሉ የመጀመሪያዋና የመጨረሻዋ የክርስትና ምድር ምናልባት ኢትዮጵያ አገራችን ብቻ ልትሆን እንደምትችል ለመመስከር ይችላል።

ምንም እንኳን ትውልዳችን ሞኛሞኝ፥ ደካማና ለጠላት በቀላሉ ተጋልጦ የሚኖር ትውልድ ሆኖ ቢታየንም፡ ጽኑ በሆነ የክርስቲያናዊ ሕይወት ጎዳና ተግቶ የሚጓዘው ኢትዮጵያዊ ቁጥር ከምንገምተው በላይ በጣም ከፍ ያለ ነው። በአሁኑ ጊዜ በተለይ ኢትዮጵያውያን ወጣት ሴቶች፡ እናቶችና ልጆች ናቸው የክርስትናችንና የኢትዮጵያውነታችን ጽኑ መከታዎች ሆነው የሚገኙት። ጠላቶቻችን አንዳንድ መንፈሰ–ደካማ የሆኑ ሴቶቻችንን እንደምሳሌ በመውሰድ የወገኖቻችንን ስም ለማጥፋት ይጥራሉ፡ እኛም በቀላሉ የምንሰማውና የምናየው ይህ ብቻ ስለሚሆን እህቶቻችን ሁሉ የተበላሹ እንደሆኑ አድርገን ለመውሰድ እንበቃለን። ይህ ግን እጅግ በጣም የተሳሳታና ከእውነትም የራቀ ነገር ነው። ሴቶቻችን ከምንግዜውም በበለጠ ጥልቅ መንፍሳዊ ጉዞ ላይ ይገኛሉ፥ ሴቶቻችን አስደናቂ በሆነና ትጋት በተሞላበት መልክ የዓብያተ ክርስቲያናቱን ግቢዎች ዕለት ተዕለት እየሞሉ ጸሎታቸውን ያደርሳሉ። ይህ ሁኔታ እስካሁን አለመታየቱና ተገቢውን ትኩረት አለማግኘቱ በጣም ሊያሳዝነን ይገባል።

ባጠቃላይ ግን፡ የኢትዮጵያ ወጣት በሚያገኘው አጋጣሚ ሁላ የክርስትና ሕይወቱን በሚገባ ለመኖር ከፍተኛ ጥረት በማድረግ ላይ ይገኛል። መንፈሳዊ ጦርነት ላይ እንገኛለንና፡ ክርስቲያኑ በየትምህርት ቤቱ፡ በየገባያው፡ በታክሲና በየአውቶቡሱ የቅዱሳንን ምስሎች በመለጠፍና መስቀልንም በማንጠልጠል ለጠላቶቹ ድምጽ–አልባ የሆነ ኃይለኛ መልእክት በማስተላለፍ ላይ ይገኛል። “ከቀስት ፊት ያመልጡ ዘንድ፥ ለሚፈሩህ ምልክትን ሰጠሃቸው” (መዝ.59:4)

ታዲያ ይህ በእንዲህ እንዳለ፡ መንግሥታዊና መንግሥታዊ ያልሆኑ የብዙኃን ዜና ማሰራጫዎች ደግመው ደጋግመው የሕዝቡን ኃይለኛ የልብ ትርታ ለማዳመጥ አሻፈረኝ ይላሉ፥ ክርስቲያኖችንና ክርስትናን፡ ማለትም፡ ኢትዮጵያውያንን በቸልታ ማለፉን ይመርጣሉ። የሬዲዮና የቴሌቪዥን ጣቢያዎች፤ እንዲሁም ጋዜጦችና መጽሔቶች ሁሉ በክርስትና ላይ ለማመጽ በአንድነት ውል የገቡ ይመስላሉ፡ ከእሁድ እስከ እሁድ ያለማቋረጥ የሚያወሩት፡ የሚያሳዩትና የሚጽፉት ስለ ፖለቲካ፥ ስለ ገንዘብ፥ ስለ ዘፈንና ዳንኪራ ብሎም ስለ እንግሊዝ እግርኳስ ጨዋታ ብቻ ነው።

የክርስትና እምነታቸው በተሸረሸረባቸው የምዕራቡ ኢዱስትሪ አገሮች እንኳ ብሔራዊ የቴሌቪዥን ጣቢያዎች በየሰንበቱ የጸሎት ስነሥርዓት ከዓብያተ ክርስቲያናት በቀጥታ ያስተላልፋሉ። የክርስቲያኖች ደሴት በሆነችው ኢትዮጵያ ግን ቴሌቪዥኑ በቅዱስ ሰንበት ፈጣሪን በትንሹም ቢሆን በማስታወስ ፈንታ፡ እንደ “ኢትዮጵያን አይደል” ወይም “ፖሊስና እርምጃው” የመሳሰሉት ፕሮግራሞች ደጋግሞ ማቅረቡን ይመርጣል። ጸረ–ክርስትና፡ ጸረ–ክርስቲያን እየሆኑ በመጡት የአሜሪካ እና አውሮፓ አገሮች የዜና ማሰራጫዎች እንደ ‘ፋሲካ‘እና ‘ገና‘ ለመሳሰሉት በዓላት የሚሰጡት አትኩሮት አሁንም አልቀነሰም፤ ሪዲዮና ቴሌቪዥን ጣቢያዎች በዓላቱ ከመድረሳቸው ከሣምንታት በፊት ነው የገና ዜማዎችን የሚያሰሙት፥ ምርጥ የገና ዜማ ሰሌዳዎችንም ያወጣሉ፤ የሮማው ፓፓስ ሆኑ ነገሥታቱና የአገር መሪዎቹ ሁሉ ለሕዝቦቻቸው የሚያቀርቡትን መልዕክት በሬዲዮና ቴሌቪዥን በቀጥታ ያስተላልፋሉ። ቀንደኛ ኢ–አማንያን እንደሆኑ የሚታወቁት እንደ Bill Mahr የመሳሰሉት ታዋቂ አሜሪካውያን የቴሌቪዥን ሰዎች ሳይቀሩ “አሁንስ በዛ! ከቤተሰብ ጋር አብረን የምናከብረውን የገና በዓላችንንማ አንነጠቅም” በማለት እየመጣ ወዳለው አስከፊ ጊዜ ይጠቋቁማሉ።

ታዲያ በpolitical correctness (ይሉኝታ)በሽታ የተለከፈው   የምዕራቡ ዓለም እንኳ ማንነቱን ገና ሙሉ በሙሉ ለመካድ ሳይነሳሳ፡ ለምንድን ነው የኛዎቹ መሪዎች፡ ጋዜጠኞችና ጣቢያዎቻቸው አባቶቻቸው ለታገሉለትና ለሞቱለት የክርስትና ሕይወት ግድየለሽነትን የሚያሳዩት? በትዕግስተኛውና በዝምተኛው ሕዝብ ዘንድ ከፍተኛ ቅሬታን እያሳደረ የመጣውን ይህን ሁኔታ አይተው አስፈላጊውን የማሻሻያ እርምጃ ለመውሰድስ እስካሁን ለምን ተሳናቸው?

_____________________________________________________