Britanistan | The Fall of an Unrepentant Nation

“Islamic State will attempt a cyber-attack on nuclear power stations or air traffic control systems within five years”

My Note:  September is going to be an interesting month. The lords of this world are inciting violence and bloodshed in Africa, East Asia (Korea + Japan) etc. Kim Jong-Un is a Swiss-Indoctrinated Freemason who was indoctrinated and manchurianed while living in Switzerland for nine years. With the nuclear drama, Lil Kim is is in the NWO´s satanic Hegelian dialectics – being just an antithesis of Rothschild´s London city´s Hegelian dialectics.

We will watch closely what Obama and his cousin Odinga are up to in Kenya right now.

Now, to the Ishamelites: they’re doing just what their role model, Mohammad did. I say it again and again, folks in the West are still asleep , it will take a nuclear bomb and 1 million dead before the western world wakes up and realizes that they are all going to be murdered by these Muslims unless they do something very very serious.

---

Britain Is Home To Up To 35,000 Islamic Fanatics Of Whom 3,000 Are ‘worrying’ For Mi5 Says Europe’s Top Anti-Terror Official

Gilles de Kerchove singled out UK for having most radicalised Muslims in Europe

• France has 17,000, Spain 5,000 and Belgium 500, Mr de Kerchove predicted
• Also warned ISIS will try cyber attack on nuclear power stations within five years

Britain is home to up to 35,000 fanatical Islamists of whom 3,000 are ‘worrying’ for the security service MI5, Europe’s top anti-terrorism official said today.

EU counter-terrorism coordinator Gilles de Kerchove singled out the UK as having more radicalised Muslims than any other country in Europe.

Mr de Kerchove also warne Islamic State will attempt a cyber-attack on nuclear power stations or air traffic control systems within five years.

This could be done by paying Russian hackers to break into vital computer systems.

The official, who is in regular contact with security services, terrorism experts and governments around Europe, said: ‘The United Kingdom has identified 20,000 to 35,000 radicals.

‘Of these, 3,000 are worrying for MI5, and of those 500 are under constant and special attention.

‘France has 17,000. Spain many less, but more than 5,000 I suppose. In Belgium almost 500 have been to Syria and there are around 2,000 radicals or more.

‘I wouldn’t like to put a concrete figure on it, but (in Europe) tens of thousands, more than 50,000.

‘We must select those who are really worrying and the most dangerous, and they should be monitored 24 hours a day, seven days a week.’

Mr de Kerchove, who has been in his position since 2007, was speaking in an interview with Spain’s El Mundo newspaper.

He warned European countries will suffer further attacks inspired by ISIS – and said greater measures must be taken to prevent them.

Selected comments:

That number seems a little low !

Britain also fifty plus million people, who are getting pretty fed up with the the powers that be, not doing anything to punish these people.

Thank you Tony Blair!

Thank Merkel too

Congratulations May, Cameron, Clegg, Brown, and Blair! Yes you lot have allowed this sickening situation to develop into this. 35000 fanatics here WHO WANT to blow our children into pieces WOW.

Imagine if this had been the case in 1938/39. If the left of today had been a force of power back then, they would have welcomed Nazis into Britain with open arms.

I guess up to date figures for Germany are not yet available!

You can’t stop them…they are everywhere! Angela Merkel started all this drama and it won’t go away!

Will the BBC report this? No.

The death of Europe

Source

---

 

Islamic Prayer in Manchester Oldham Council

---

It has emerged over the summer that the latest Full Council meeting of Oldham Council opened with Islamic prayer led by an Imam. This is not the first time this has happened. Tim Dieppe explains what was said and shows how the Imam misquoted the Qur’an. He argues that the problem with pluralism is that it assumes all religions are equally valid and equally good for society when they are not. Islamic prayer is prayer to a different god, that seeks political and spiritual influence in society.

It has emerged over the summer that the latest Full Council meeting of Oldham Council opened with Islamic prayer led by an Imam. The new Mayor of Oldham is a Muslim and asked his Imam to lead the prayers. The previous Mayor asked an Anglican chaplain to lead prayers. The mayor before that was also Muslim and also had prayers before full Council meetings led by an Imam.

Watch The Video

Videos of all the Council meetings are available online. In the video for the Full Council Meeting on 12^th July 2017, the Islamic prayer starts at 6:25 minutes. The meeting on 16 July 2014 also starts with Islamic prayer (from c.4:00), as do various other Full Council meetings.

Chanting In Arabic

Looking at the video of the latest meeting on 12^th July, the Imam begins by chanting in Arabic (from 6:25 minutes). This means that what he said would not be understood by the vast majority of people in the Council meeting. This in itself is alienating to the members of the Council.

The Imam’s Arabic chanting includes various standard salutations to ‘the prophet’. He refers to Muhammad as: “The lord and master of all messengers.” Did the members of the Council realise what was being said? Muhammad was being described as the highest messenger.

Misquoting The Qur’an

In the meeting of 12^th July, the Imam says that: “No religion, no culture tolerates extremist behaviour.” (7:05). Presumably this means that he doesn’t think that behaviour endorsed by Islamic State is extreme in any way.

Then he says that: “The Qur’an says that whoever kills a body unlawfully, or for creating disorder in the land, it is as if he has killed the entire of mankind.”

Here he is taking a phrase from verse 5:32 from the Qur’an which reads:

“On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person – unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land – it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our messengers with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.” (Q 5:32 Yusuf Ali)

Note how the Qur’an says that this instruction was “ordained for the Children of Israel”. That means it was for the Jews. The verse actually uses a quotation from the Jewish Talmud (Mishnah Sanhedrin 4:9; Babylonian Talmud, Tractate 37a).

Note also that, contrary to what the Imam said, there is an exception for “murder or for spreading mischief in the land.” In this case, according to the Qur’an, killing someone would be permitted for the Jews. This exception is inserted into the quotation from the Talmud.

The very next verse is not restricted to the Jews, and provides explicit punishments for those who oppose Islam:

“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter.” (Q 5:33 Yusuf Ali)

Therefore, the Imam is misquoting the Qur’an as a simple reading of his quotation in context shows.

Comparison With Jews And Christians

Later in the prayer, the Imam recites the daily prayer (7:41):

“Guide us to the straight path. The path of those upon you have favoured, not of those who have earned your anger, nor of those who have gone astray.”

This is a quotation from verses 1:6-7 of the Quran. What is not often realised, is that traditionally, “those who have earned your anger” refers to Jews, and “those who have gone astray” refers to Christians.

This is seen, for example in the Tasfir of al-Jalalayn:

“the path of those whom You have favoured with guidance from alladhīna together with its relative clause is substituted by ghayri l-maghdūbi ‘alayhim not the path of those against whom there is wrath namely the Jews and nor of those who are astray namely the Christians. The subtle meaning implied by this substitution is that the guided ones are neither the Jews nor the Christians.” (Tasfir al-Jalalayn)

Further evidence that this is the traditional interpretation is provided here. Therefore, the Imam is effectively praying for the Council not to be like Jews or Christians.

Council Prayers Allowed

Back in 2012 a court ruled that council prayers were unlawful as part of a formal meeting. A government Bill was enacted in 2015 to resolve the issue. The Local Government (Religious etc. Observances) Act 2015 makes specific provision for council meetings to include “prayers or other religious observance, or observance connected with a religious or philosophical belief.” The Bill does not say that the prayers must be Christian and so a council is free to hold Islamic prayers as part of its business should it choose to do so.

The Problem With Pluralism

The problem with pluralism is that it assumes all religions are equally valid and equally good for society when they are not. Pluralism is also inherently unstable as different religions or worldviews compete with one another for influencing society. Sooner or later one or other worldview will gain the dominant influence and set the foundation for society.

Islamic prayers are prayers to a different god. A god that seeks political and spiritual influence in society. Oldham council using Islamic prayers is yet another example of the increasing influence of this Islamic god in our society.

Source

______

Trump Says It: ‘I Think Islam Hates Us’

Donald Trump has just smashed another politically correct taboo, and the consequences will be profound. Speaking to Anderson Cooper in a CNN interview, he blatantly stated what I suspect a majority of Americans believe: “I think Islam hates us.”

This is a discussion long overdue.

Actually, it is very clear what Islam is: the Koran and Hadith. And they are very clear about infidels:

Source

“In a time of universal deceit – telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” – George Orwell

__

Never Take a Christian Leftist to the Zoo

It’s the uncontested opinion of a very small circle of my friends that we will never take a Christian leftist to the zoo. Aside from the fact that Christians have had a historical tendency to be thrown to the lions, there have been a few cases in which Christians have thrown themselves into the lion’s den. But this grisly reason aside, the reason we never take a Christian leftist to the zoo is purely selfish. It’s because he’s more likely to throw you to the lions, and then praise the Lord for making him better than everyone else.

This latent brand of leftism most usually makes an appearance when you’ve got to make a serious decision about your country’s survival. Then all of a sudden the un-neighborly neighbor begins spouting all kinds of scandalous things on Facebook about how God has not given us a spirit of fear and pretending to risk his life in reckless causes with minimal payouts at maximum expense. And there’s almost always a catch. The reason God hasn’t given him a spirit of fear because He’s given you one. And He has given you one because you are the person who’s actually being endangered.

For instance, you can find a liberal Christian worrying about the people in prison – but not about the people they harmed to get there. You can find him clamoring to spend more on the poor – but not with the money that’s taken from him (it’s most usually stolen from children). He frequently tells us not to judge – but only the things and people he personally feels comfortable around. He always wants to house illegal immigrants and hostile refugees – but never in his own home. He wants us to get rid of our weapons because of the children, and wants us to get rid of our children because of the mothers, and he claims that he who loses his life shall find it. We applaud him in the last measure – we give him liberty to lose his life. We want him to pack up and evangelize to ISIS. We do not give him liberty to lose ours or anyone else’s.

The liberal Christian is pitiable because he lives a life full of contradictions. His own morality isn’t even really moral, because it isn’t even really possible. He says, on the one hand, that the mark of the Christian is a wild and irrational charity, which means letting go of everything you ought to hold dear and grabbing on to everything you shouldn’t. On the other hand, he feels the need to lock his front door. He says that dying for Christ is admirable and then wonders whether living is moral. And he wonders this because once he’s decided that he’s responsible for the people he isn’t responsible for, every Christmas tree is purchased at the expense of an African’s meal and every hour of leisure spent at the expense of a soup kitchen. He gives so he can make the world a better place. When a part of the world is a better place, he quickly tries to make it worse. The moment he feels he’s helped you on your feet is the moment he will try to knock you off them.

The strange appeal of Christian altruism comes from the fact that it isn’t really altruism. Not only because there isn’t any such thing as altruism (which everyone with any sense already knows), but because Christians believe there isn’t anything to lose. In a certain sense they believe they have everything, which is why they appear to be ready to lose everything. The difference between liberal Christians and intelligent Christians isn’t that one has Heaven and the other one doesn’t. It’s that one of them knows the difference between giving everything and taking everything.

There’s a reason why “altruism” is so appealing, and it’s because the person who gives things gives without asking. It’s the same reason we avoid people who take without giving. At its core, we love altruistic people because we love being around people who benefit people (because we are people); and we love committing acts of altruism because we want other people to love us as much as we love ourselves. The people who say altruism is unselfish are ignorant of their interests, which means they’re also ignorant of yours. Altruism is an indulgence of our instinctual pity and an expression of our sociability. In Christianity, as in the rest of life, it is God’s means of glorifying Himself (Heb 12:2). All respectful acts of self-interest are moral, which is why Jesus spent the overwhelming majority of his life as a working man. An act of altruism is an attempt at endearment and a monument to self-worship.

The great beauty of the Christian religion is found not anywhere in Christian morality, but in the one thing liberal Christians are worse at than anything else – which is biblical theology. It lies in the fact that if there really is a God out there who knows you at your worst and gave you His very best, then everything we could suffer on Earth is only for a moment, and everything really great about life is going to last forever. It’s why Christians sing the sappiest love songs ever written. Christians love their God because He first loved them at His own expense. And herein lies something crucial. Had Jesus never been a member of the Trinity, the Gospel would have been a very different story – which is why Christians have been willing to kill each other over the doctrine. An intelligent Christian is a moral Trinitarian, and wants to give himself. A liberal Christian is morally Arian and wants to give someone else. And the someone else he wants to give is you.

What Christian leftists have forgotten is that altruism is a beautiful thing until it becomes mandatory – which is when it becomes murderous. And the moment we cross the line between giving without a reward and forcing others to give without a reward, we have left the realm of altruism entirely. There is a very specific name for the kind of people who view the lives, liberty, and property of their neighbors as nothing more than a means to a personal end – even if it is a “spiritual” end. We call them robbers, murderers, and tyrants. The liberal Christian robs and endangers Christians to enrich the world’s barbarians and losers, and he does it to glorify himself at minimal personal expense. The Apostle Paul said a man who refuses to take care of his family is worse than an infidel. It has yet to be heard what he’d say of a man who robs the body of Christ.

Source

__