Berlin Police Instructor Claims Muslim Recruits ‘Enemy in Our Ranks’ in Leaked Recording

A leaked audio recording has revealed a Berlin police academy instructor talking about problems dealing with migrant recruits, saying that many have stolen items and threatened other officers with violence with the instructor calling them an “enemy in our ranks”.

The unidentified police instructor complained that many officers who come from migrant backgrounds, specifically from Turkish and Arabic origins, refuse to learn in the academy classrooms and some have trouble simply articulating or writing in German, Die Weltreports.

In the recording, which was confirmed to be authentic by the Berlin police on Wednesday, the instructor said:

“I’ve never experienced anything like this, the classroom looked like hell, half Arabs and Turks, cheeky as hell. Stupid. Could not articulate. Two or three I had been close to knocking out because they only disturbed and literally slept. German colleagues have said that they were threatened with violence.”

The instructor added that he was

“so shocked, and I’m really scared of them, and I think the trainers too because if they throw them out, they’ll be there and break everything”.

The future of the Berlin police force looks in jeopardy according to the instructor who said the migrant police officers would be

“a second-class of police that will only be corrupt”.

“These are not colleagues, that’s the enemy. This is the enemy in our ranks and I have never felt such hostility in this class,”

he added.

Police spokesman Thomas Neuendorf said that while he objected to the instructor’s tone, “He was clearly in an overwhelmed situation.”

According to sources within the police academy, the problems with migrant recruits is nothing new. The source said Turkish, Arab, and Afghan recruits “lack respect” and many refused to accept female officers with one student questioning why a female officer did not dress conservatively enough in her time off-duty.

Another issue has been that many individuals related to Arab clan criminal gangs have also been joining the forces. An official said that the police could not criticise those with a clean record but noted:

“We know that with these people the family is above everything else.”

Arab clan gangs have also reportedly been recruiting asylum seekers in asylum homes to run low-level drug operations and the connection between the drug scene and the radical Islamist scene has authorities in the city concerned.

If an Islamist were to infiltrate the Berlin police, it would not be for the first time. Last year, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) arrested one of its own officers who was not only recruiting jihadists but plotting to bomb the agency headquarters in Cologne.

Selected commetns:

“ENEMY IN OUR RANKS!!!” = TROJAN HORSE UNDER OUR NOSES!!!

You have to believe that the people have can see and feel the truth are on the front lines. If the German police in the ranks are saying this then they feel afraid too. It’s just a slow but SERIOUS creepy ideology taking over in the name of DIEversity.

There’s nothing wrong with ‘diversity’ if the recruits are on our side, but they aren’t. That is the utter stupidity of all this. There is precedence yet they continue to train and arm these men and expect something different to happen.

The german people will suffer under this muslim trojan horse police force.

These second-rate officers are a fifth column that will turn traitor and join the jihadists in the Muslim enclaves (AKA no-go zones) in German cities in the event of civil war. Their commitment to putting Muslims first rather than professional standards is seen by their willful refusal to acculturate to the German police. And even if those Muslim officer who fail are bounced out, they still have skills of use to the jihadists. This certainly will not end well.

They have already joined the jihad. These are infiltrators waiting for the right moment.

When the liberals who supported this find themselves getting raped by one of these animals, they can call the police and discover the policeman that turns up just wants to join in. Only at this juncture will they realise they have destroyed themselves.

Thanks Merkel and supporters …. you are more damaging for Europe than the Nazies where on time!

Source

Zombie Riot? Clashes With Police Turn Festive Celebrations Into Halloween Horror In Germany

---

— Women Sexually Assaulted By ‘North African, Arab’ Migrants in Cologne on Halloween

— Cost of Asylum Seekers Up 73 Per Cent in One Year to Over Nine Billion Euros

______

Britanistan | The Fall of an Unrepentant Nation

“Islamic State will attempt a cyber-attack on nuclear power stations or air traffic control systems within five years”

My Note:  September is going to be an interesting month. The lords of this world are inciting violence and bloodshed in Africa, East Asia (Korea + Japan) etc. Kim Jong-Un is a Swiss-Indoctrinated Freemason who was indoctrinated and manchurianed while living in Switzerland for nine years. With the nuclear drama, Lil Kim is is in the NWO´s satanic Hegelian dialectics – being just an antithesis of Rothschild´s London city´s Hegelian dialectics.

We will watch closely what Obama and his cousin Odinga are up to in Kenya right now.

Now, to the Ishamelites: they’re doing just what their role model, Mohammad did. I say it again and again, folks in the West are still asleep , it will take a nuclear bomb and 1 million dead before the western world wakes up and realizes that they are all going to be murdered by these Muslims unless they do something very very serious.

---

Britain Is Home To Up To 35,000 Islamic Fanatics Of Whom 3,000 Are ‘worrying’ For Mi5 Says Europe’s Top Anti-Terror Official

Gilles de Kerchove singled out UK for having most radicalised Muslims in Europe

• France has 17,000, Spain 5,000 and Belgium 500, Mr de Kerchove predicted
• Also warned ISIS will try cyber attack on nuclear power stations within five years

Britain is home to up to 35,000 fanatical Islamists of whom 3,000 are ‘worrying’ for the security service MI5, Europe’s top anti-terrorism official said today.

EU counter-terrorism coordinator Gilles de Kerchove singled out the UK as having more radicalised Muslims than any other country in Europe.

Mr de Kerchove also warne Islamic State will attempt a cyber-attack on nuclear power stations or air traffic control systems within five years.

This could be done by paying Russian hackers to break into vital computer systems.

The official, who is in regular contact with security services, terrorism experts and governments around Europe, said: ‘The United Kingdom has identified 20,000 to 35,000 radicals.

‘Of these, 3,000 are worrying for MI5, and of those 500 are under constant and special attention.

‘France has 17,000. Spain many less, but more than 5,000 I suppose. In Belgium almost 500 have been to Syria and there are around 2,000 radicals or more.

‘I wouldn’t like to put a concrete figure on it, but (in Europe) tens of thousands, more than 50,000.

‘We must select those who are really worrying and the most dangerous, and they should be monitored 24 hours a day, seven days a week.’

Mr de Kerchove, who has been in his position since 2007, was speaking in an interview with Spain’s El Mundo newspaper.

He warned European countries will suffer further attacks inspired by ISIS – and said greater measures must be taken to prevent them.

Selected comments:

That number seems a little low !

Britain also fifty plus million people, who are getting pretty fed up with the the powers that be, not doing anything to punish these people.

Thank you Tony Blair!

Thank Merkel too

Congratulations May, Cameron, Clegg, Brown, and Blair! Yes you lot have allowed this sickening situation to develop into this. 35000 fanatics here WHO WANT to blow our children into pieces WOW.

Imagine if this had been the case in 1938/39. If the left of today had been a force of power back then, they would have welcomed Nazis into Britain with open arms.

I guess up to date figures for Germany are not yet available!

You can’t stop them…they are everywhere! Angela Merkel started all this drama and it won’t go away!

Will the BBC report this? No.

The death of Europe

Source

---

 

Islamic Prayer in Manchester Oldham Council

---

It has emerged over the summer that the latest Full Council meeting of Oldham Council opened with Islamic prayer led by an Imam. This is not the first time this has happened. Tim Dieppe explains what was said and shows how the Imam misquoted the Qur’an. He argues that the problem with pluralism is that it assumes all religions are equally valid and equally good for society when they are not. Islamic prayer is prayer to a different god, that seeks political and spiritual influence in society.

It has emerged over the summer that the latest Full Council meeting of Oldham Council opened with Islamic prayer led by an Imam. The new Mayor of Oldham is a Muslim and asked his Imam to lead the prayers. The previous Mayor asked an Anglican chaplain to lead prayers. The mayor before that was also Muslim and also had prayers before full Council meetings led by an Imam.

Watch The Video

Videos of all the Council meetings are available online. In the video for the Full Council Meeting on 12^th July 2017, the Islamic prayer starts at 6:25 minutes. The meeting on 16 July 2014 also starts with Islamic prayer (from c.4:00), as do various other Full Council meetings.

Chanting In Arabic

Looking at the video of the latest meeting on 12^th July, the Imam begins by chanting in Arabic (from 6:25 minutes). This means that what he said would not be understood by the vast majority of people in the Council meeting. This in itself is alienating to the members of the Council.

The Imam’s Arabic chanting includes various standard salutations to ‘the prophet’. He refers to Muhammad as: “The lord and master of all messengers.” Did the members of the Council realise what was being said? Muhammad was being described as the highest messenger.

Misquoting The Qur’an

In the meeting of 12^th July, the Imam says that: “No religion, no culture tolerates extremist behaviour.” (7:05). Presumably this means that he doesn’t think that behaviour endorsed by Islamic State is extreme in any way.

Then he says that: “The Qur’an says that whoever kills a body unlawfully, or for creating disorder in the land, it is as if he has killed the entire of mankind.”

Here he is taking a phrase from verse 5:32 from the Qur’an which reads:

“On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person – unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land – it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our messengers with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.” (Q 5:32 Yusuf Ali)

Note how the Qur’an says that this instruction was “ordained for the Children of Israel”. That means it was for the Jews. The verse actually uses a quotation from the Jewish Talmud (Mishnah Sanhedrin 4:9; Babylonian Talmud, Tractate 37a).

Note also that, contrary to what the Imam said, there is an exception for “murder or for spreading mischief in the land.” In this case, according to the Qur’an, killing someone would be permitted for the Jews. This exception is inserted into the quotation from the Talmud.

The very next verse is not restricted to the Jews, and provides explicit punishments for those who oppose Islam:

“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter.” (Q 5:33 Yusuf Ali)

Therefore, the Imam is misquoting the Qur’an as a simple reading of his quotation in context shows.

Comparison With Jews And Christians

Later in the prayer, the Imam recites the daily prayer (7:41):

“Guide us to the straight path. The path of those upon you have favoured, not of those who have earned your anger, nor of those who have gone astray.”

This is a quotation from verses 1:6-7 of the Quran. What is not often realised, is that traditionally, “those who have earned your anger” refers to Jews, and “those who have gone astray” refers to Christians.

This is seen, for example in the Tasfir of al-Jalalayn:

“the path of those whom You have favoured with guidance from alladhīna together with its relative clause is substituted by ghayri l-maghdūbi ‘alayhim not the path of those against whom there is wrath namely the Jews and nor of those who are astray namely the Christians. The subtle meaning implied by this substitution is that the guided ones are neither the Jews nor the Christians.” (Tasfir al-Jalalayn)

Further evidence that this is the traditional interpretation is provided here. Therefore, the Imam is effectively praying for the Council not to be like Jews or Christians.

Council Prayers Allowed

Back in 2012 a court ruled that council prayers were unlawful as part of a formal meeting. A government Bill was enacted in 2015 to resolve the issue. The Local Government (Religious etc. Observances) Act 2015 makes specific provision for council meetings to include “prayers or other religious observance, or observance connected with a religious or philosophical belief.” The Bill does not say that the prayers must be Christian and so a council is free to hold Islamic prayers as part of its business should it choose to do so.

The Problem With Pluralism

The problem with pluralism is that it assumes all religions are equally valid and equally good for society when they are not. Pluralism is also inherently unstable as different religions or worldviews compete with one another for influencing society. Sooner or later one or other worldview will gain the dominant influence and set the foundation for society.

Islamic prayers are prayers to a different god. A god that seeks political and spiritual influence in society. Oldham council using Islamic prayers is yet another example of the increasing influence of this Islamic god in our society.

Source

______

Islamists Ally with Liberals & Leftists: You Know a Man by His Enemies

How Muslims Take Control of The United Kingdom

• Mayor of London … MUSLIM
• Previous Mayor of Birmingham … MUSLIM
• Previous Mayor of Blackburn … MUSLIM
• Previous Mayor of Sheffield … MUSLIM
• Previous Mayor of Oxford … MUSLIM
• Mayor of Luton … MUSLIM
• Mayor of Oldham … MUSLIM
• Mayor of Rochdale … MUSLIM

• Over 3,000 Muslim Mosques
• Over 130 Muslim Sharia Courts
• Over 50 Muslim Sharia Councils
• Muslims-Only No-Go Areas Across The UK

• Muslim Women … 78% don’t work and are on FREE benefits/housing
• Muslim Men … 63% don’t work and are on FREE benefits/housing
• Muslim Families … 6-8 children planning to go on FREE benefits/housing

• All UK schools are now ONLY serving HALAL MEAT!
• All this achieved by just 4 million Muslims out of the 66 million population!

How Muslims Take Control of America

American Mosques: Warehouses of Jihad

They do it first by establishing mosques in every town and city. These meeting places are perfect warehouses of not only indoctrination, but future terrorists, who are made to read and understand the principles of jihad, martyrdom, and Dar-al-Harb (“land of war” – any place not Islamized).

Mosques cost money, and the money for these warehouses of hate is coming straight from Saudi Arabia. These mosques are being infused with an activist strain of Islam, Wahhabism. If you have to ask where the Saudis are getting their money, you are not paying attention…it’s coming from you. According to “The Mosque in America: a National Portrait,” a survey released in April 2001, there were at least 1,209 mosques in the U.S. Today, it’s estimated that that number has quadrupled.

Mosque Leaders Promote Sharia

Mosque elders tend to be sent to the U.S. with one clear mission: make sharia law the supreme rule within the United States, using any and all tactics necessary. Next, from within the safety of their local mosques, they begin to use their revolting practices, riotous youth, and wild sermonizing to force genteel Americans to relocate to safer, less threatening neighborhoods and cities. Of course, not all Americans will move or can afford to do so. To take control of a town, Muslims will not need to evict everyone. They probably need about 25% in order to make life very unpleasant for those who do not go along with their demands.

Political Islamist Infiltration

They will elect Muslims to all positions of local influence, who will create and enforce policy according to the Quran. Once they have control over a town, they will begin to establish informal sharia, and there’s nothing the government can (or will want to) do about it.

Sharia is the brutal means by which Islam controls its populations by force, intimidation, and punishments for offenses to Allah. Already, in many European countries, national governments have, out of fear, given Islamic fascists the right to establish their own shadow governments within the borders of countries like Sweden, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, France, and England, where they can control their own populations without accountability. Proposals for sharia are being taken seriously by Canada.

This is an admission that Islam is not just a religion. It is a cult. It seeks total control over a person’s mind and body. As such, our Constitution is totally incompatible with it. Muslims will push politicians for local control and self-determination of their own laws. In this way, America will become two nations: a weakened traditional one and a growing, menacing Islamized one.

Islamists Ally with Leftists

At the same time, Muslims will ally with leftist politicians, who will gladly cede some of their power to this group of enforcers, so conservative politicians and Christians who advocate self-defense and sane social policies are kept out of office. Money that was once used to build mosques will now be used to buy politicians. On university campuses, Islam will be portrayed as righteous and peaceful, while Christianity will be associated with evil Western and American values. Rebellious American youths (BLM, OWS, antifa, etc.) will eat it up.

There will be increasing local and regional incidents of crimes and threats against Christians, Jews, and anybody who speaks out against the religion of hate. Terrorism is a completely legitimate tool of Islam and was widely practiced and advocated by Muhammad. Remember: all words in the Quran are perfect, immutable laws defining an eternal ethic:

Against them (the unbelievers) make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly. (Quran 8.06)

Leftist politicians will continue to hold the Bill of Rights over anyone who dares to accuse this religion of wrongdoing. Islamized citizens will ignore skyrocketing crime and threats. They will look the other way for fear of retribution, honor killings, and punishments from those who uphold the Islamic requirement to seek revenge on anyone who dishonors or disagrees with Islam.

Eventually, America will become weakened, and politicians will allow the Muslims to do whatever they want, as long as the infidels are allowed to be free of terrorist threats. As Christianity wanes, people will reject it as an anachronism irrelevant to modern trends. Islamic ethics will prevail, and Muslim sects will gain members, money, and influence.

Islam Will Destroy Our Constitution

As government policies lean toward Islamic ideals, the Bill of Rights will be seen as archaic and out of touch with contemporary values and the new direction of the country. It will be just a piece of parchment in a museum, lacking anyone who would be so bold and revolutionary as to fight a religion, even a religion of hate.

Regrettably, a vast ignorance prevails in this sphere. Academic pundits, leftist journalists, and hired Islamic apologists, useful idiots, proclaim that Islam is a religion of peace and that the great majority of Muslims are not a party to any plans and actions of radicals.

Islam Is Irreconcilable with Our Culture

So how do we stop this sequence of events? How can our government, which has so effectively protected the rights of peaceful religions, protect us from an aggressive one? How should we put Islam out of business?

By massive allocation of an educational campaign while simultaneously declaring Islam for what it is: an ideology irreconcilable with our core beliefs enshrined in the universal declaration of human rights and the United States Declaration of Independence and Constitution. By treating Islam the way we treated Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan, and Maoists. By preventing Islamization of our country by all legal measures and staunchly resisting the creeping sharia in our society.

Perhaps it is time to realize that not all religions are the same. If a religion does not recognize the constitutional rights of others, it must lose its rights under First Amendment protections. If it seeks to control all aspects of our life by force and fraud, if it seeks exemption from national laws protecting constitutional rights, then it must not be considered a religion.

It must be called something else, and it cannot be recognized as a protected ideology under the First Amendment.

O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: they are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guides not a people unjust. (Quran 5:51)

Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you. (Matthew 5:44)

Any religion or dogma that seeks to create its own government and its own legal system and seeks to mobilize its own militia is itself not interested in separation of church and state and has no right to use that separation to create hegemony. In fact, such a doctrine is not even a religion at all. It is a totalitarian regime and must be considered the enemy of everything Americans believe in.

I’d welcome an inspection of other religions to determine if they are truly peaceful, and I am confident that all other faiths will remain protected and unaffected because religions tend to be peaceful. There is only one faith that seeks global hegemony for a seamless church-state government and imposition of its law everywhere, and that’s Islam.

Source

Islamofascists And Marxists Versus Trump…And Each Other

Jihad infiltration is not a new thing. The Soviet KGB infiltrated the United States in the 1940s and ’50s, using the smiling propaganda image of Uncle Joe Stalin during the brief U.S.-Soviet alliance against Hitler. Once that war was won, at the cost of immense bloodshed and treasure, Stalin turned against us and had the CPUSA steal the Manhattan Project plants. The Democrats, who had committed treason in time of war (the standard for treason in the U.S. Constitution, Article 3), put up such a loud scream-fest that most Republicans and ordinary Americans were intimidated. In the 1960s, the radical left conducted a classical March through the Institutions, inspired by Italian Communist Arturo Gramsci, covered up with love and peace propaganda. Americans fell for the sucker play, and we allowed the totalitarian left to rewrite the history of the 1940s and ’50s. Today, you can’t find a single self-confessed Stalinist anymore, just as you can’t find any self-confessed Nazis in Germany. History has been erased.

Just as Stalin made an alliance with Hitler before the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union, the radical left has made common cause with jihad. If anything is obvious beyond a reasonable doubt, it’s that jihad long ago infiltrated the British Labor Party, which ran Islamophile Sadiq Khan as mayor of London, a man who is now smearing Donald Trump with all the others. Just as Nixon was the lynch mob target for the CIA’s Ben Bradlee and the FBI’s Mark Felt in the 1970s because he had outed the CPUSA’s Helen Gahagan Douglas and other Stalin agents, today Donald Trump is screamed at by an organized chorus of jihadophiles of the left. They are not difficult to spot, being exactly the same people who rationalize and minimize any fresh massacre of innocents anywhere in the world. The left has always been incredibly cruel and murderous, as in Marx’s infamous endorsement of “revolutionary terror” to create a global Worker’s Paradise. In the outcome, they murdered 100 million innocent people over the course of Soviet dominance, and the Kim dynasty is still doing it in North Korea. There simply is no rational justification for the totalitarian left, and if you scratch a nice liberal, you’re more than likely to find a totalitarian. Evil is evil, even if it comes packaged in pink vagina hats.

Marxism has nothing in common with jihad except a common enemy. When Khomeini took power in Iran, with the quiet help of Jimmy Carter and his spooky Gray Eminence Zbig Brzezinski, the first thing Khomeini did was to destroy the Communist Party of the Shah’s Iran, the Mujahedeen Khalq. They probably deserved each other, but the point is that jihad, when it comes to power, hates nobody more than Marxist atheists, who are their real competition for totalitarian cred. In Syria, Assad is a mass murderer fighting jihadists like al-Qaeda, Hezb’allah and ISIS, and in the best imaginable scenario they would just knock each other off and leave the rest of us alone. Unfortunately, such precise and cosmic justice is limited to cartoons.

Our enemy is not just jihad. It is the totalitarian left in alliance with jihad. That alliance makes no ideological sense, since Islam is the last war theology in the world, while Marxism is a religion-hating war ideology. The cult hysteria is the same, but the ideology is totally different. Our foolish liberal atheists keep thinking Islam is on their side, but all the Saudi missionary imams in every mosque in the world have their knives ready for godless atheists. It’s just that atheists have such contempt for religion that they don’t even get the creeps when another white van careens into pedestrians in Central London.

Ask not for whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee.

So Lenin’s useful idiots are out in force again, screaming, screaming, screaming through every high-tech channel in the world. Karl Marx wrote for newspapers. Stalin and Hitler used radio. The American left learned how to dominate Hollywood movies and TV. And now Google and Facebook can barely hide their left-o-jihadist sympathies.

But evil is still evil, and you shall judge them by their actions, not their silly cartoons.

Continue reading…

___

Hillary Clinton Tops Middle East Forum’s ‘Islamist Money List’

The Middle East Forum has released its 2015-16 “Islamist Money In Politics” list, charting the top ten recipients of contributions from Islamic organizations — and Hillary Clinton is at the top of the list.

According to the Middle East Forum, their list tracks political donations from “from individuals who subscribe to the same Islamic supremacism as Khomeini, Bin Laden, and ISIS.”

Clinton has received a total of $41,165 from individuals that the Middle East Forum describes as “prominent Islamists,” including $19,249 from senior officials of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which was declared a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates on November 15, 2014.

Republican Party candidate Donald Trump and Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson took no money from Islamists, according to the report.

Green Party candidate Jill Stein has reportedly accepted $250, while defeated Democratic Party candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders accepted $9,285 Jill Stein has accepted $250. Donald Trump and Gary Johnson have not received any Islamist money.

Other top recent recipients of money from the enemy include Rep. Keith Ellison ($17,370) and Rep. Andre Carson ($13,225). The top-ten list includes nine Democrats, one independent (Sanders), and no Republicans.

Candidates	2015-2016	Lifetime
Hillary Clinton (D-NY)*	$41,165	$46,665
Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MA)	$17,370	$193,758
Rep. Andre Carson (D-IN)	$13,225	$63,009
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)	$9,285	$9,485
Pramila Jayapal (D-WA)*	$6,957	$6,957
Former Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-PA)	$3,500	$10,500
Dwight Evans (D-PA)*	$3,500	$3,500
Rep. Donna Fern Edwards (D-MD)	$2,900	$4,900
Rep. Gerald Connolly (D-VA)	$2,850	$19,400
Rep. L. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)	$2,835	$2,835

 

Hillary Clinton has been a fierce critic of Donald Trump’s proposal for a freeze on Muslim immigration to the United States. “We are a country founded on religious freedom and liberty. How do we do what [Trump] has advocated without causing great distress within our country?” Clinton said earlier this month. “Are we going to have religious tests when people fly into our country?”

Beyond political donations, the Clinton Foundation has received millions from Islamic countries. Saudi Arabia, dominated by radical Sunni fundamentalists and ruled by Sharia law, donated up to $50 million to the Clinton Foundation, while the Emirate of Qatar has donated between $1 million and $5 million.

According to Clinton’s own State Department, Qatar’s human rights violations include “trafficking in persons … legal, institutional, and cultural discrimination against women limited their participation in society.”

Source

Living the high life and selling her soul to the devil at our expense.

She receives so much money from the Middle East that she should run for president over there! What the heck is she doing here??!!

¡M A D R E    M I A!

—Piers Morgan:  Hillary Looks Unstoppable But There Are Still 20 Reasons I Dread The Day She Walks Into The White House

__

Hillary Clinton’s Aide Worked at a Radical Muslim Journal For a Dozen Years

Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide, and the woman who might be the future White House chief of staff to the first female US president, for a decade edited a radical Muslim publication that opposed women’s rights and blamed the US for 9/11.

One of Clinton’s biggest accomplishments listed on her campaign website is her support for the UN women’s conference in Bejing in 1995, when she famously declared, “Women’s rights are human rights.” Her speech has emerged as a focal point of her campaign, featured prominently in last month’s Morgan Freeman-narrated convention video introducing her as the Democratic nominee.

However, soon after that “historic and transformational” 1995 event, as Clinton recently described it, her top aide Huma Abedin published articles in a Saudi journal taking Clinton’s feminist platform apart, piece by piece. At the time, Abedin was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs working under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief. She was also working in the White House as an intern for then-first lady Clinton.

Headlined “Women’s Rights Are Islamic Rights,” a 1996 article argues that single moms, working moms and gay couples with children should not be recognized as families. It also states that more revealing dress ushered in by women’s liberation “directly translates into unwanted results of sexual promiscuity and irresponsibility and indirectly promote violence against women.” In other words, sexually liberated women are just asking to be raped.

“A conjugal family established through a marriage contract between a man and a woman, and extended through procreation is the only definition of family a Muslim can accept,” the author, a Saudi official with the Muslim World League, asserted, while warning of “the dangers of alternative lifestyles.” (Abedin’s journal was founded and funded by the former head of the Muslim World League.)

Continue reading…

— State Dept. Dodges Questions About Huma Abedin’s Role at Radical Islamic Journal

__