SHOCK VIDEO: CNN Creates #FakeNews in London Following Terror Attacks, Stages Anti-ISIS Muslim Protesters

A video released a day after the Islamic terror attacks in London show a CNN crew staging a scene with Muslims holding signs saying “ISIS Will Lose”.

The same crowd was used for the following AP post it appears – note the man with green around his neck in both pictures. This is how fake news spreads.

Below are videos of the behind-the-scenes work CNN did to stage the photo-op with Muslims holding up signs that read, ‘ISIS WILL LOSE’.

English newspaper columnist for the Daily Mail, Katie Hopkins chimed in as well saying,

“Please watch. You are being deceived.”

Selected Comments:

The media has been doing this for many years. I’m so glad they got caught. Listen to the lies they are telling to cover and justify this. It is downright propaganda.

This is more frightening than the jihadis themselves.

CNN has gone from sick to totally depraved. The aren’t reporting news, they are trying to brainwash viewers. I’ve cut the cord. I will not pay to have this filth pumped into my house.

CNN has been carrying pro-muslim, pro-terrorist propaganda since 1990 at least. And they’ve done it quite consistently.

CNN is a leftist toilet that hasnt been flushed in 20 years..

Can someone explain to me why CNN is the ONLY cable station in EVERY airport(at least every US airport I have experienced).

I can’t stomach even watching CNN anymore! They are a complete and total part of the elite political establishment

Source

— CNN Is Being Sued After Correspondent Arwa Damon Reportedly Bit an EMT While Drunk in Baghdad

— Watch the Tense On-Air Exchange That CNN Edited Out of Christiane Amanpour’s Interview with RT Host

__

Petition Calls on BBC to Keep Christian Output

An almost 12,000-signature petition has been handed to the BBC, asking it to reject proposals to reduce Christian programming.

It also calls for Aaqil Amhed to be removed from his position as Head of Religion and Ethics on the grounds of his “clear bias towards Islam and contempt for Christianity”.

The petition, which was handed to the BBC by Christian group Voice for Justice UK, was launched in May, after Mr Ahmed claimed the BBC was ‘too Christian‘ in its religious output, and should give more airtime to other faiths.

Mr Ahmed, who is a practising Muslim, has compiled a report suggesting that Muslim, Hindu and Sikh faiths should receive more programming airtime.

The report is currently being considered by the BBC’s Director-General, Lord Hall, who could make changes to religious output.

‘Misrepresented’

Speaking to Premier Rev Lynda Rose, CEO of Voice for Justice UK, said: “The UK is actually a Christian country, it’s established as such by statue, all our laws, our traditions, our culture is founded on Christian values, so it would seem entirely right that Christianity be given priority air time.”

“It is right that Christanity be respected for what it is, our values be respected, that it be presented fairly, and that in the programming schedules the status of Christanity as the established religion of this country should be recognised.”

“Even when it comes to general programming, Christians are being misrepresented or treated unfairly, they’re either portrayed as barmy, or they’re very much portrayed as endosring modern, secular views.”

BBC rhetoric to make more religious programmes

According to Premier, a BBC Spokesperson responded, saying: “We are actually intending to do more programming around Christianity and more on other faiths as well, so there is absolutely no question of an ‘either or’ on our output.

“BBC Head of Religion and Ethics, Mr Ahmed is not biased against Christianity programming, nor does he show any pro-Islamic bias and any suggestions that he does are ludicrous and unfounded.”

‘Anti-Christian at the BBC’

The BBC’s anti-Christian bias has been highlighted in recent years, by the Corporation’s own staff.

In 2006, Andrew Marr, the BBC’s former political editor, said: “The BBC is not impartial or neutral. It’s a publicly-funded, urban organisation with an abnormally large number of young people, ethnic minorities and gay people.

“It has a liberal bias not so much a party-political bias. It is better expressed as a cultural liberal bias.”

In 2011 a former BBC news anchor, Peter Sissons, said “left-wing bias is at the core of the BBC, in its very DNA”.

He went on to say: “[At the BBC] Islam must not be offended at any price, although Christians are fair game because they do nothing about it if they are offended.”

In 2013, former presenter Roger Bolton said the BBC thinks Christians who disagree with gay marriage are “throwbacks who are damaging the Church”.

He went on to add if the BBC interviews a Christian who objects to abortion on religious grounds, “they are treated as though they are just a bit barmy”.

‘Islamic State are Muslims and their doctrine is Islamic’

Mr Ahmed is the first Muslim to hold the position of Head of Religion and Ethics at the BBC. At a Lapido event in June, in response to criticism of the BBC’s use of the term ‘so-called Islamic State’, he stated that “The Islamic State are Muslims and their doctrine is Islamic.“

Christian Concern’s Director of Islamic Affairs, Tim Dieppe, commented on the admission saying: “Ahmed is quite right to state that the Islamic State is Islamic. Christians should be unafraid to proclaim the Islamic basis for the brutal behaviour of the Islamic State. In this way we are loving our Muslim friends who need to recognise the true nature of Islam and come to experience the love of Christ.”

Listen to Tim Dieppe discuss the petition on Premier Radio’s Your News.

Source

— The BBC is morally bankrupt – a true reflection of society

— We need a referendum on the vile BBC

__

On June 30, 1966, fifty years ago, that noble Christian movement inextricably connected to the emancipation of slaves, compassion for animals, and temperance in the consumption of alcohol – “feminism” – began to die. On that day, the National Organization for Women, a front group for radical leftists, was founded. Truly creepy characters like Betty Friedan, who as a Stalinist picketed the White House to stop America from helping Britain fight Hitler, infested this vile creation from the outset.

The pattern to anyone familiar with radical leftism is clear: dream up names for organizations that either tell nothing of the Marxist tilt (e.g., American Civil Liberties Union) or infest and dominate once respectable organizations (e.g., Sierra Club) and then turn the whole organization into a front group to attack America or Judeo-Christian values or free enterprise.

Feminism once was a noble movement. It was overtly Christian, and it was inextricably intertwined with several other movements like ending slavery, preventing cruelty to animals, and encouraging temperance in the consumption of alcohol. Feminism was emphatically not an advocacy group for women, and to the extent that it spoke on the subject, feminism insisted that women must assume the burdens as well as the privileges of citizenship.

The Stalinist replacement for feminism that ugly monstrosities like NOW represented was rather womenism, a blatantly man-hating, utterly self-serving, and emphatically anti-Christian group without the slightest interest in justice or equality or even protecting women. The function of women to NOW is like the function of blacks to the NAACP: peasant levies, conscript armies, manacled slaves shoved roughly into a battle most women never wanted to fight.

NOW, like all the other variety of Marxist fronts, strictly adheres to this old Marxist maxim: “The worse, the better” and its close corollary “The more innocent, the more guilty.” The more wretched the women, the more powerful NOW becomes – and power, here and always, is the sole real aim of leftism. Creating gaping fissures between men and women suits the interests of womenists quite well. Happy marriages, joyful parenthood, and peace between the sexes defeat everything that womenism represents.

Beyond profiting from misery, NOW, like all other incarnations of leftism, spews rhetoric marinated in mendacity. Anyone remotely acquainted with the hideous history of militant abortionism knows what Bernard Nathanson revealed about the deliberate lies told to advance “the cause” – lies that make the corruption of Planned Parenthood look positively Pollyannaish by comparison.

Womenism is pockmarked with fabrications, inventions, and lies. Because truth means nothing to womenists and because dishonesty is so quickly believed by those told that they are “victims,” womenism scarcely has to correct itself or answer for its falsehoods. Often it is the producer of bogus data, and it hides the source of that data or so obscures the origin that it is almost impossible to decipher the convoluted paths of origin of these data.

Because womenism is not about women, but only about anti-Americanism and anti-Christianism, the womenist hacks at NOW are as silent about the true horrors faced by women throughout the non-Christian world as Betty Friedan was about the nightmarish conditions women endured in Stalinist Russia, Maoist China, and Hindu India.

Feminists like Katherine Mayo and Soong May-ling and Clare Booth Luce, all deeply religious and all brave and brilliant advocates of what was right, fought the true misogyny of Hindu India and pre-Christian China and Stalinist Russia. This advocacy, however, served no purpose besides helping protect the basic dignity of women around the world so womenists have ignored these great champions. Womenists are invariably cowards, taking potshots from tenured professorships in such nonsensical disciplines as “Women’s Studies” in rich private universities.

Womenism exists today largely because its disciples have created generations of women utterly dependent upon a sense of victimhood emotionally and economically. That is, in fact, anti-feminism, and it is a repudiation for all the good things feminism once represented.

Source

__