Tests conducted on the skeleton of an ancient human ancestor who lived in England show he had “dark to black” skin, researchers said.
Racist all over the country are going crazy over this news. They are livid about it! I knew more truths would be coming….. i predict suicide rates may start to rise among the woods in Europe and beyond.
How Cheddar Man Shatters Accepted Views Of Immigration
The discovery that the 10,000-year-old original Briton is dark-skinned absolutely has bearing on contemporary debates on race and migration
You’ve got to confess it’s worthy of chuckles and cackles.
A made-for-Internet scientific discoverythat at the same time strikes at the core of modern racial strife. An announcement Wednesday that DNA tests on the oldest complete skeleton in Britain, that heart and ancestral home of many white people around the world, suggest that the first modern Briton was blue-eyed, yes, but very dark-skinned and curly-haired.
The Cheddar Man, named thus for the English village of Cheddar where his skeleton was discovered in 1903, is about 10,000 years old.
To add salt to a supremacist’s wound, scientists said that the genes for lighter skin likely came from, you got it, immigrants from the Middle East.
Oh snap.
Dark-skinned native Britons and light-skinned immigrants.
It’s like reaching into the eye of a storm and fitting it with sunglasses.
Disorienting.
Those brave lads and fair maidens on glorious historical British dramas on TV — descendents of immigrants.
The image of God himself, majestic, kindly old white guy in white robes with flowing white beard — fashioned on immigrants.
Imagine being Nigel Farage, the former leader of the U.K. Independence Party, who proudly stood in front of a Nazi-era-like poster with the slogan, “Breaking point: the EU has failed us all,” and a photo of a winding lineup of migrants of colour.
Now he would have to change that slogan to “Breaking point: I come from them. I am them.” Such horror.
No wonder there were hopeful comments online about Cheddar Man such as, “Who’s to say the person’s not a foreign visitor” or a call to index this as “fake news,” or the insistence that this was a finding driven by a social justice agenda to force poor victimized British people into accepting mass migration.
The Cheddar Man, 10,000 years old though he may be, absolutely has bearing on contemporary debates on race and migration.
This discovery of a dark-skinned original Briton doesn’t put the race genie back into the bottle in an equalizing “we’re all immigrants” kind of way.
On the contrary, in exposing the racial fluidity of Britons, Cheddar Man delivers a sucker punch to toxic ideas that drive the white power mobs who in turn fuel xenophobic policies.It reveals the basis of their quick codes equating skin colour to valour or danger as nothing but fear-based fiction.
Scientists have long argued that race is not a biological concept. People of one race — or at least people who can be grouped together with similar physical traits — are not genetically homogenous.
The concept of races evolved as a way of justifying slavery and to maintain an economy founded on slave labour; it was easier to rationalize the brutalization of the “savage” than to face the unconscionable alternative.
From then on, it continues to be a favoured tool to demonize “the other.”
Around the world, oppressor groups have always found identity a useful tool with which to assert themselves as inherently superior, as “natural” holders of power, be it on the basis of race, gender, sexual identity, religious identity, tribal identity or caste.
That race isn’t real does not mean racism isn’t real.
Anti-Black racism is so widespread and global in scope, that I wish scientists would hurry up and create a bust out of the fossils of the 750,000-year old Peking Man, for instance, and in keeping with the Out of Africa theory, definitively establish Blackness as the root ancestry of Chinese people.
Such knowledge might have given the Hubei Provincial Museum in Wuhan pause before it displayed a photography exhibit that juxtaposed wild African animals with Black African people.
I wish they were able create a bust that would depict an original “Indian Man,” one who existed before the Aryans and Dravidians did 5,000 years ago, as black-skinned — darker the better. Such knowledge might inject a modicum of humility before privileged Indians wreak racist violence on African students and caste-related violence on Dalits.
When nations look to figure out where they’re going next, it makes sense sometimes to turn back and look at the past for clues.
Being reminded of a shared heritage with people they consider coming from “s—hole” countries, might give Western leaders, including a certain U.S. president, a few pointers as they ponder immigration policies.
These leaders might read data helpfully put forward by Arvind Magesan, associate professor of economics, University of Calgary, in The Conversation. That might help them discover that although their own policies play a part in making those countries “s—holes,” those immigrants continue to be better educated, better employed (although lower-paid) than those of, shall we say, “Norway-like” countries.
This is one way the discovery of Cheddar Man’s skin colour could have the power to force aside the ahistorical lens with which we view our fellow humans.
A number of people have been injured after at least one gunman apparently targeting black people opened fire in the Italian city of Macerata, according to reports.
The mayor of Macerata, located about 125 miles (200km) east of Rome, said a “person who sowed panic in our city” was captured after locals were told to stay inside for their own safety.
“The person who sowed panic in our city this morning was captured. You can get out of your homes and pick up the kids from school!” Mayor Romano Carancini said in a statement posted on local Facebook sites.
Just an hour earlier, officials had told locals to stay indoors as an “armed man in a car is shooting in the city.”
The website of newspaper Corriere della Sera said a man fired from a car window at two young African migrants shortly after 11am. (10am UK time) Saturday, injuring one of them. A short while later another migrant and an African woman were shot.
Italian police confirmed that all those injured were of “foreign nationality.”
It was unclear how many perpetrators were involved but Italian newspaper La Repubblica said there may have been two people in a black Alfa Romeo.
At least seven people were injured in the attack, according to local reports, and five have been taken to hospital, according to local media reports.The website of newspaper Corriere della Sera said a man fired from a car window at two young African migrants shortly after 11am. (10am UK time) Saturday, injuring one of them. A short while later another migrant and an African woman were shot.
Italian police confirmed that all those injured were of “foreign nationality.”
It was unclear how many perpetrators were involved but Italian newspaper La Repubblica said there may have been two people in a black Alfa Romeo.
At least seven people were injured in the attack, according to local reports, and five have been taken to hospital, according to local media reports.
These devils doing the same evil now in Libya, Niger, Mauritania and Sudan today.
People need to realize this documentary was made in the 1960’s can you imagine what kind of brutality and dehumanization happened centuries ago, before the evil European came to Africa. The Arabs were, still are more brutal than the Europeans.
President Trump’s “Shithole“ remarks against Africa came, days after the vast majority of African states voted against the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Last night, during his State of the Union speech, President Trump renewed aid threat against countries opposing Jerusalem decision (Africans, in particular).
Last Sunday, the Arab League called for African states to reject Israel’s candidature for UN Security Council (UNSC) seat for 2019-2020.
What now? Will Africans continue demonstrating their solidarity with the same Arabs who are enslaving their children in the deserts of Libya, Niger, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia?
The colonial crimes committed by Arabs, against Africans, through Islam, very often go unchecked and unspoken under the guise of political correctness and avoidance of offending religious sentiments.
For the last 50 years, Africans had frequently been urged to embrace their Arab enemies as their brothers, and to join with them under some version of regional administrative union for „the victims„. Africans have their own matters and problems, they should not waste their time and energy in supporting or condeming entities outside of their continent, so, Africa stay away from the Arab Israeil conflict. Now, should black Africans of today allow these devilish advocates to prevail, then they have nobody to blame but themselves for whatever the Arabs do to them.
Africans Rebuff Arab Call For U.N. to Expel Israel
The Organization of African Unity, refused today to adopt a resolution calling for the expulsion of Israel from the United Nations.
Rebuffing Arab militants, it approved a milder version calling for moves “to reinforce the pressure exerted on Israel at the United Nations and its specialized agencies, including the possibility of eventually depriving it of its membership.”
This resolution, adopted at the closing session of the annual meeting of presidents and premiers of O.A.U. countries, was an unexpected setback for the Arab diplomatic campaign aganist Israel. Among those opposing a direct call for Israel’s expulsion from the United Nations was Egypt, which has been involved in negotiations for a second disengagement accord with Israel in Sinai.
Last month in Jidda, Saudi Arabia, the Arab militants won adoption by a conference of foreign ministers of 39 Islamic countries and the Palestine Liberation Organization of a resolution calling for the expulsion of Israel from the United Nations.
The resolution was recorded as having been adopted without dissent from any of the participants, among them Egypt.
Delegates at the O.A.U. conference here said that at one point during the Middle East debate the Libyan leader, Col. Muammar el‐Qaddafi, shouted that Egypt was failing to support the Palestinian cause. He also complained, delegates said, that President Anwar el‐Sadat of Egypt gave the issue so little priority that he left the session before the debate began last night.
President Idi Amin or Uganda, chairman of the O.A.U., who presided over the conference, was quoted as having asked Mohammed Riad, Mr. Sadat’s foreign affairs adviser, whether Egypt would support Israel’s expulsion from the United Nations. Mr. Riad was said to have replied In the negative.
The measure that was adopted was weaker than either of the two, proposals before the conference—one by Egypt asking that Israel be suspended until she withdrew from occupied Arab lands, and the other by the Palestine Liberation Organization calling for outright expulsion.
The adoption of the weekend version was interpreted as refleeting growing resentment among black Africans In the 42‐nation organization against what they considered inadequate Arab compensation for the effects of increased oil prices.
One member, Zaire, expressed opposition to any move to remove Israel from the United Nations.
However. Zaire allowed the action on the resolution to be recorded as adoption without dissent. The Zaire view was a reservation made afterward in accordance with Q.A.U. practice. Four other countries also presented reservations.
The meetinf, which opened Monday, was boycotted by Tanzania, Zambia and Botswana.
The conference actions included a decision to send a commission, to Angola to look into a possibility of establishing an O.A.U. peacekeeping force there.
On the question of southern Africa, a Geciaration was adopted endorsing further efforts to negotiate with whiteminority governments in Rhodesia and South Africa provided that liberation movements approved. This was a compromise between those countries opposed to any contacts with the white‐minority governrhents and those wanting a dialogue aimed at producing black rule.
TEL AVIV, Aug. 1. Israelis were heartened today when they learned that the conference of the Organization of African Unity in Kampala had bilked at adopting an Arab-sponsored resolution to exclude Israel from the United Nations.
The development was a pleasant surprise to experts in Jerusalem, whose earlier assessments were that the resolution would be adopted.
Officials said it appeared that the number of countries opposing the Arab initiative was growing.
The net test of the Arab initiative is due at the conference of nonaligned nations in Lima, Peru; where the Islamic world will be more strongly represented.
UNBELIEVABLE how much we know about the Atlantic and Roman slave trade, but barely anyone even knows about the 14 centuries of Arab Muslim slave trade with these insanely high death tolles, which included large numbers of African slaves. Africans must be teaching this in their schools too.
Arabs’ Mortal Hatred And Enslavement Of The Black Race
Dr. Azumah in his book: The Legacy of Arab-Islam in Africa provides several examples of Islam’s hatred of Blacks. There is the example in the hadith in which an Ethiopian woman laments her racial inferiority to Muhammad, who consoles her by saying, “In Paradise, the whiteness of the Ethiopian will be seen over the stretch of a thousand years.
No nation in Africa has suffered more in the hands of the Arabs than Ethiopia. It has been going on since Arabs first invaded Africa in the 7th century CE. Recently, with Libya supporting the people of Eritrea, they destroyed the basic structure of Ethiopia, to cut her from the sea and weaken this section of Africa, and eventually all of Africa, for further Arabization. They did this mercilessly with religion.
Ibn Sina (Avicenna 980–1037), Arab’s most famous and influential philosopher/scientist in Islam, described Blacks as “people who are by their very nature slaves.” He wrote: “All African women are prostitutes, and the whole race of African men are abeed (slave) stock.” He equated Black people with “rats plaguing the earth.” Ibn Khaldum, an Arab historian stated that “Blacks are characterized by levity and excitability and great emotionalism,” adding that “they are every where described as stupid.”
Muslim Arab and Persian literature depicts Blacks as “stupid, untruthful, vicious, sexually unbridled, ugly and distorted, excessively merry and easily affected by music and drink.” Nasir al-Din Tusi, a famous Muslim scholar said of Blacks: “The ape is more capable of being trained than the Negro.” Ibn Khaldun, an early Muslim thinker, writes that Blacks are “only humans who are closer to dumb animals than to rational beings.”
al-Dimashqi, an Arab pseudo scientist wrote, “the Equator is inhabited by communities of blacks who may be numbered among the savage beasts. Their complexion and hair are burnt and they are physically and morally abnormal. Their brains almost boil from the sun’s heat…..” Ibn al-Faqih al-Hamadhani painted this no less horrid picture of black people, “…..the zanj (the blacks) are overdone until they are burned, so that the child comes out between black, murky, malodorous, stinking, and crinkly-haired, with uneven limbs, deficient minds, and depraved passions…..”
After the Arabs had conquered Egypt and shortly after Muhammad’s death, they began demanding Nubian slaves from the south. This continued for 600 years. Dominated African kingdoms were forced to send on a regular basis, tributes of slaves to the Arab ruler in Cairo. From as early as the 6th century CE, they had developed slavery supply networks out of Africa, from the Sahara to the Red Sea and from Ethiopia, Somalia and East Africa, to feed demands for slaves all over the Islamic world and the Indian Ocean region. The African male slaves were castrated and used as domestic servants or to work the Sahara salt deposits or on farms all over the Islamic world.
The African female servants were continuously raped before being sold to households to be used as sex labour. Of springs from the illicit encounters were largely destroyed as unworthy to live. Between 650 CE and 1905 CE, over 20, 000,000 African slaves had been delivered through the Tans-Sahara route alone to the Islamic world. Dr. John Alembellah Azumah in his book: The Legacy of Arab-Islam in Africa estimates that over 80 million more died en-route. A text from Dr. Azumah books, provides this quote from a Zanzibar observer about the travails of African slaves en-route to slave markets around the Arabic world.
Arab Muslimsmeltingplastic on anaked Body of an African – in the year 2018
Arabs did not only start and sell African slaves from the 6th to the 19th century in the Islamic world; they were the principal raiders, merchants and middle men for the Atlantic slave trade. In fact, even now, hundreds of years later, millions of African settler slaves are still being discriminated against and treated as the scum of the earth (untouchables) in Pakistan, India, Iran, Iraq, and all the Muslim states of Asia, the Persian Gulf, and Northern Africa.
Arab enslavement of Black Africans continues to this day in the Muslim world, particularly in the Sudan, Niger, and Mauritania. To admit that it is a mistake would be to admit the fallibility of the Qur’an and bring its divine origin into question. Even today, Muslims act as if Islamic slavery was a favor done to the millions of unfortunate men, women and children who were forcibly uprooted from their native lands and sent to lives of sexual and mental servitude deep in the Islamic world.
Arab imperialism is worse than European imperialism, only that the latter is less subtle and more widespread. Europeans relatively, have some conscience, not much, but they are, at least, slightly more tolerant of dissent than the Arabs. Europeans did not completely destroy African cultures. Our history and religions yes, while our cultures and traditions were largely derided as primitive and banned, ignored or marginalized. In all areas conquered by Islam, the natives lost their ethnic names, religions, and peculiar way of life, to those of their Arab masters. The slaves or the religiously colonized Muslims are left bare, without a past or future of their own, a worse form of slavery and emasculation.
The Arabs stripped us totally of everything, our history, religions, cultures, names, languages and traditions. Their religion overwhelmed our cultures and traditions wherever they conquered us, to the extent that Africans in Arab governed states today, no longer bear their original African names, nor do they remember their history. They cannot even recall that they were Black, independent and thriving communities, before the Arabs colonized them. They cannot imagine that they were the original settlers and masters of the entire Arab world. All African natives in Arab governed countries, think that Allah ordained their inferior status to the Arabs.
Egypt is still so intimidated by its glorious Black African past that its Arab government would not allow thorough research into Egypt’s past. President Gamal Abdel Nasser falsified Egyptian history when he declared Egypt an Arab Republic. Anwar Sadat was forced to divorce his Black wife, denounce his Black children and marry a light-skin cousin before becoming Egypt’s President. Egyptian authorities refused to allow American film makers to make a film on the life of Anwar Sadat in Egypt on the ground that the actor chosen for Sadat’s role was Black.
When Morocco left the OAU in 1984, it aspired to become a member of the European Union. In Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Eritrea, Mauritania and the rest of the Arab world, Africans are treated as the scum of the earth. They are second-class citizens at the very best in their own countries. Blacks in these countries cannot aspire to positions of respect or authority. There are hardly Africans in high government positions in Arab governed African countries. Like Brazil, which is just as racially cruel against their Black natives, there is no legislation favoring slavery (except in Mauritania.) It is simply a way of life that’s all. Blacks do not really exist or at best are not humans.
Arabs themselves divide Africa into North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa to instigate a division and as long as the invaders continue to occupy our land and treat us as slaves in North Africa, the two segments of the continent cannot cohabit.
The Arab war against Africans and the Arabization of African lands that started in the 7th century CE. Arabs have since settled on one-third of Africa, pushing continuously southwards towards the Atlantic Ocean. Arabs’ racial war against Black Africa started with their occupation and colonization of Egypt between 637 and 642 CE, decimating the Coptic or Black population. Between 642 and 670 CE, more Arab invaders poured into Africa and occupied areas known today as Tunisa, Libya, Algeria and Morocco, where they physically eliminated most of the native (Berber) inhabitants. The Berbers that escaped death ran westwards and southwards towards the Sahara.
A traveller in Sudan observed in 1930 that “In the eyes of the Arab rulers of Sudan, the Blackslaves were simply animals given by Allah to make life of Arabs comfortable.” In 1962, the Arab Sudanese General, Hassan Beshir Nasr, while flagging off his troops to the war front against Black Africans in South Sudan, declared: “We don’t want these Blackslaves…….what we want is their land.”
The Arabs that invaded Africa and called Africans slaves in their own God-given land are worse than European colonisers. How ironic, if the Europeans stayed away from Africa, the destructive and cancerous nature of Arabness/Islam would have destroyed African nations by now.
London Protest Against Slavery in Libya – An Arab Deflecting Blame From Those Arabs Who Are Committing These Crimes – Why was the protest not lead by an African?
