Three years ago, Aideen Strandsson, an Iranian actress who had converted from Islam to Christianity applied for asylum in Sweden on the grounds that apostasy is a capital offense in her home country. (Don’t ask me why her name sounds Swedish rather than Iranian.) This summer, Swedish authorities turned her down. They were fully prepared to send her back to Iran – and to her death – when the Hungarian government stepped in and agreed to take her. It is just one individual’s story, but it illuminates the dramatic difference between Western and Eastern Europe when it comes to matters that will, before too long, decide the future of the continent.
Sweden, of course, is one of those Western European countries that have eagerly granted asylum to armies of Muslims who pose as refugees from persecution but who are, in fact, economic migrants, eager to climb onto the welfare-state gravy train. Hungary, meanwhile, is one of those Eastern European countries that refuse to take in Muslims but are willing to accept Christians.
The logic, in both cases, is clear. Western European politicians and bureaucrats tend to be postmodern multiculturalists – in Sweden, fanatically so. They feel a contempt for their own civilization and they regard this contempt as a mark of sophistication and virtue. They have made a fetish of unqualified respect for other cultures, however objectively undeserving those cultures may be of any decent person’s regard. They are especially fond of cultures that share their own contempt for the West, and hence there is no culture for which they show more deference than that of Islam, which since its founding has been at war with what used to be called the Christian world.
The postmodernists live, of course, in countries that are – or were, until they started ruining it all – free, prosperous, and safe, and they feel an obligation to share their good fortune with as many Muslims as possible, even if it means, in the long run, destroying that freedom, prosperity, and safety. In the case of Sweden, this self-destructive impulse is so strong that the country has actually opened its arms to returning ISIS terrorists – and given them all kinds of freebies to make them happy.
When a Muslim such as Strandsson converts to Christianity, however, all bets are off. Her otherness is immediately erased, effaced, nullified. Western officials who reflexively treat everything having to do with Islam with delicacy and respect take an entirely antithetical view of a Muslim who has converted to Christianity. While they regard Islam, the religion of “the other,” as by definition virtuous – as a faith whose adherents should be automatically esteemed, appeased, and rewarded – they view Christianity, the faith of their despised Crusader ancestors, as intrinsically iniquitous, a religion of conquest and oppression. In the eyes of the truly fervent Swedish multiculturalist, sending someone like Strandsson back to a place like Iran to be brutally executed by the merciless enforcers of sharia law is not obscenely immoral but is, rather, the ultimate gesture of respect – and thus an act of virtue.
What makes Eastern Europe so different from Western Europe in this regard is simple: it is not postmodern. It rejects multiculturalism. Its officials, perversely enough, are actually on their own side. Having been under the Soviet boot within living memory, they have not enjoyed freedom long enough to take it for granted. In their view, their primary duty is not to serve the interests of strangers from distant lands but to preserve the liberty, culture, prosperity, and security of their own people – and to reach out a hand to those who need their help and have embraced their values. “Taking in persecuted Christians,” said Hungary’s Deputy Prime Minister, Zsolt Semjén, about the Strandsson case, “is our moral and constitutional duty all at once.”
Strandsson’s story is far from unique. Last September it was reported that Sarmad Ozan, an Iraqi engineer and Christian deacon whose home city of Mosul had been overrun by ISIS and cleansed of Christians, had requested asylum in Britain, where he was studying. But the Home Office denied his request, ordering him to return home. Since Ozan is a Christian and his former neighbors in Mosul have all become ISIS supporters, the Home Office’s decision amounted to a death sentence. He appealed; as of last spring, he was still awaiting a reply.
Then, this past February, Front Page’s Daniel Greenfield told the story of an Iraqi Christian family who were denied asylum in Germany by a headscarf-wearing Muslim official, of which there are apparently many working in that country’s immigration service. A Member of Parliament, Wolfgang Bosbach, complained, pronouncing it ridiculous that a devout Muslim should be in a position to rule on asylum applications by Christians fleeing the Islamic world; but the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees dismissed his concerns.
Under President Obama, of course, the U.S. government pursued a similar policy toward Middle Eastern Christians. As of the beginning of 2015, reported the Daily Mail in September of that year, the U.S. had granted asylum to 4,200 Muslims but only 727 Christians. Lisa Jones of Christian Freedom International asserted that these numbers made “no sense”: “These are people from a Christian culture like our own that needs protection from ISIS…. While many more Muslims are granted asylum over here, Christians are being systematically exterminated.” In 2016, according to a Pew report, “about 99 percent of Syrian refugees admitted to the U.S. were Muslim, while less than 1 percent were Christian.”
When Donald Trump announced shortly after his inauguration that he would be reversing this disgraceful policy – giving priority to Christian refugees from Muslim persecution and instituting “extreme vetting” for possible jihadists – all sane, decent Americans should have applauded. Instead, millions reacted in outrage at what their brainwashing by multicultural-minded news media, teachers, and professors led them to see as an expression of bigotry – confirming yet again that if Islam is the number-one enemy of Western freedom today, multicultural indoctrination in our own ranks is Islam’s most potent ally.
Insanity in Germany | „ Germany Is The Only Country That Gave Simultaneous Protection To The Victims And The Persecutors
When you grow up in an Islamic country like Iran, you know also the dark side. You experience it every day on your own skin. you live with it, you grow up with it. Especially women, who in an Islamic country have no rights whatsoever. I wouldn’t want to live like that. And I don’t wish such a life for my daughter, either.
I you are born in a Muslim country you automatically are Muslim, whether you want it or not.
Even in Iran it is true that people live a double life: one official and the other, the underground one. Underground people live freely. There are numerous finished basements, with soundproof walls, where people can have a totally normal life. Because this open way of life isn’t allowed above, on the street. It’s hard to explain:
in Islam it’s really like that, that pretty much everything is forbidden, and is allowed by the back door.
Fore example, alcohol is forbidden. You will be whipped if you drink alcohol. For a medical reason it’s allowed, so everybody who wants to drink becomes „ill“.
Men can do everything, and a woman is simply an object. She is a property of a man. A woman in a Muslim country isn’t a human at all. She belongs to a man, and she can do only what the man allows her.
A Muslim man can say to a woman: „I marry you for one hour“ This is, by the way, the reason why there is allegedly no prostitution in Muslim countries. He marries the lady for one hour, and the hour is over, he’s automatically divorced. And he doesn’t have to pay alimony for that reason. Aad for that reason the Iranian government says proudly: „In Iran we have no more prostitution!“ No, those women are simply „hourly wives“.
Now, when I go on a German street, I really can see my persecutors. We are refugees from Islam in Germany; we are not economic refugees. We didn’t come here because „one can live here easily“. We truly came because we were running away from Islam. I’m walking on the street now and I see my persecutors.
Germany is the only country that gave simultaneous protection to the victims and the persecutors. This cannot work well. For one thing, I simply can’t understand that a Christian party is allying with Muslims. This makes no sense whatsoever!
And Islamizaion isn’t a secret: it is out in the open! I was summoned to the elementary school, because the principal wanted my daughter – because I was born in Iran – To got to Islam class. I was really summoned by the principal. It was the only time that I ever had the opportunity to talk to that principal in four years of elementary school. He considered it self-evident that a Iranian woman would absolutely want her daughter to be sent to an Islam class. He really wanted to influence me with it because a lady from Turkey absolutely wanted to have Islam lessons. He didn’t even try to question that I might have a different belief, that I might have a different life-attitude.
We are all being lumped together. Nobody is interested way those people really came here. And this hast to change. There are people who came here because they cherish the German way of life and they want to live like that; they would like to be part of that. And there are people who simply want to destroy it. And I don’t want to allow it. This simply cannot happen!
Truly, when it’s about real refugees, that’s fine with me. But the problem is that there is no differentiation. Everyone is let it, and nobody is asking why those people arrive here.
It’s a fact that the real refugees cannot even cross the borders. There are numerous videos abot it. That the Christians who are persecuted in those countries actually die in the basements. You cannot describe it differently. The borders are being guarded by Muslim men; they let through those who can afford it or those who are working with them. It’s been known for a long time. It was, for example, Turkey is only letting people cross the border that wants to let through – Muslims. The real refugees cannot afford it. For example, the Turkish government wrote to the Iranian government which then wrote to his family that a Kurdish refugee was arrested in Turkey, that he would be returned, and for that the Turkish government also gets money. So they take money first from the Europeans, and they bring the real refugees back to their countries where they are wanted people, and then they take money again. There is nothing humanitarian about this.
There are millions of people who come there especially in order NOT to hae to work. There was even a report in German TV, which was perhaps shown once. Muslim men advertise: they are advertising especially for four and side wives. They are advertising in their home countries – because a Muslim can have as many wives he can afford, if he cannot afford them, then they’ll be paid by HARY IV (welfare). They’re advertising: „Come to Germany, be my side wife. You never have to work again. „For that is the system that is abused. It is abused on purpose. The government knew about it, but they are simply helpless.
Even pregnant with a 10th kid, they go in full veil to the state and say, „I was drunk at a disco and I don’t know who the father is. „Because when the father is unknown there’s even more money for the kids. And this proud Muslim dad sitting with two women in his arms and about 27 children, and he proudly told the story that this is how he does it. This has to stop!
The people in the government are confused. Just go on a weekend on the main street and you can see the picture. This is, I think, insanely sad, when one has to look for Germans on the street, because one cannot see them any more. Even when we have visitors from Iran tell me why did I try to convince them for eight years to visit me – it’s really difficult to leave Iran; one cannot just cross the border – „I have the veils at home as well.“
So, even the people who live in Islamic countries are warning and saying that Germany is not the country they once knew.
Also Paris, one friend said about Paris: This isn’t the beautiful, free, colorful city that I knew in my youth when I was in college.“
And from my personal experience, I would like to clearly say that Islam DOESN’T belong in Germany, for sure. I grew up in an Islamic country. I know Islam.
ቪዲዮው ብዙ ትምህርት ያዘለ ነው። በእስልምና አልኮል መጠጣት፡ በጀነት ካልሆነ፡ በዚህች ምድር የተከለከለ ነው ይላሉ። ለህክምና ምክኒያት ሲባል ግን የተፈቀደ ነው። ስለዚህ መጠጥ የሚፈልጉ ሁሉ “ታመሙ” ይባላሉ።
ሁሉም ነገራቸው ለጤናማ አእምሮ የሚያስገርም ነው፤ ታዲያ ከዚህ የበለጠ ሪያሊቲ ሾው አለን?
በነገራችን ላይ፡ ሃሺሽን፣ ኦፒየምንና የመሳሰሉትን ጎጂ እጾች ከሚጠቀሙ 10 አገራት መካከል 6ቱ ሙስሊም አገሮች ሲሆኑ፤ የመጀመሪያውን ቦታ የያዘችው ደግሞ ጥንቸል ጉረኛዋ የእስላም ሪፓብሊክ ኢራን ናት።
ከእስልምና ጨለማ ወጥታ ክርስትናን የተቀበለችውና ነዋሪነቷ በጀርመን የሆነው ኢራናዊት ካካፈለችን ጠቃሚ መረጃ በጥቂቱ፦
“ጀርመን ጥገኝነት የሰጠቻቸው አሳዳጆቼን በየመንገዱ አያቸዋለሁ…
-
እዚህም ክርስቲያኖችን እያሳደዱ ነው
-
እውነተኛ ስደተኞች የሆኑት ክርስቲያኖች
-
ቱርክን ማለፍ አይችሉም፤ አታሳልፋቸውም
-
በያሉበት ቀስበቀስ እያለቁ ነው።
-
ይህ ትልቅ ወንጀል ነው!
-
ጎድዳናዎቹን ሙስሊሞች አጥለቅልቀዋቸዋል
-
ጀርመኖች በዋና ዋና ጎዳና ላይ አይታዩም
“እኔ ያደግሁት በሙስሊም አገር ውስጥ ነው፡ ስለዚህ እስልምናን አጠንቅቄ አውቀዋለሁ።”
ልክ እንደ ኢራን እስላም በሆነች ሀገር ውስጥ ሲያድጉ፡ የጨለማውን ጎን ያውቃሉ፡ ሁሉንም ነገር በእራስዎ ቆዳ ላይ በየቀኑ ይመለከቱታል፡ ከእርሱ ጋር አብረህ ትኖራለሁ። ሴቶች በተለይ በእስላም ሀገር ውስጥ ምንም አይነት መብት የላቸውም። እኔ እንደዚያ መኖር አልፈልግም፣ ሴት ልጄም እንዲህ አይነት ሕይወት እንዲኖራት አልመኝም።
ሙስሊም አገር ውስጥ ከተወለዱ ወደዱም ጠሉም ሙስሊም የመሆን ግዴታ አለባቸው።
በኢራን ውስጥ እንኳን ሰዎች ሁለት ዓይነት ህይወት ነው የሚኖሩት፦ አንድ በአደባባይ እና ሌላው በድብቅ። ይገርማል፡ አይደል፤ በድብቅ የሚኖሩ ሰዎች በነጻነት ይኖራሉ። ሰዎች በድብቅ ህይወት ውስጥ ሊኖሩባቸው የሚያስሏቸው በርካታ ወደ መሬት የተቆፈሩ ዋሻ መሰል ቦታዎች በነፃነት ይኖራሉ። ግድግዳዎቻቸው ድምጽ እንዳያሰሙ በደንብ ይሸፈናሉ። ምክንያቱም ይህ ድብቅ የህይወት መንገድ ከላይ፡ በመንገድ ላይ አይፈቀድምና ነው። ለማብራራት በጣም ያስቸግራል – በእስልምና ውስጥ ልክ እንደዚያ ነው – እጅግ በጣም ብዙ ነገር የተከለከለ እና በስተጀርባ በር የተፈቀደ ነገር ነው።
ለምሳሌ፦ አልኮል መጠጣት የተከለከለ ነው። አልኮል ሲጠጡ ከተገኙ ይገረፋሉ። ለህክምና ምክኒያት ሲባል ግን የተፈቀደ ነው። ስለዚህ መጠጥ የሚፈልጉ ሁሉ “ታመመ” ይባላሉ።
ወንዶች ሁሉንም ነገር ማድረግ ይችላሉ። እና ሴት ደግሞ የአንድ ወንድ ንብረት ሆና ነው የምትቆጠረው።
በሙስሊም አገር ውስጥ ያለች አንዲት ሴት በጭራሽ ሰው አይደለችም፡ የአንድ ወንድ አካል እንጂል፡ እናም ሰውየው የሚፈቅድላትን ብቻ ማድረግ ነው የምትችለው።
አንድ ሙስሊም ሴት ለሴቷ “አንድ ሰዓት ላገባሽ እችላለሁ” ማለት ይፈቀድለታል። ይህ በእውነቱ በሙስሊም አገሮች ውስጥ ዝሙት አዳሪነት በይፋ ካልታወቁባቸው ምክንያቶች ውስጥ ይህ አንዱ ነው። ሴትየዋን ለአንድ ሰዓት ያገባል፤ እና ሰዓት አብቅቷል አሁን ፈትቼሻለሁ ማለት ይችልላል። ለዚህም ፍቺ ምንም ዓይነት ክፍያ አይከፍልም። ለዚህም ነው የኢራን መንግስት በኩራት “በኢራን ውስጥ የዝሙት አዳሪነት የለንም!” በማለት በኩራት የሚናገረው።. ቅጥፈት ነው፤ እነዚህ ሴቶች እንዲሁ የሰዓት ሚስቶች ናቸው።
አሁን፡ በጀርመን መንገድ ላይ ስሄድ አሳዳጆቼን በእርግጥ ማየት እችላለሁ። እኛ በጀርመን ውስጥ ከእስልምና ያመለጥን ስደተኞች ነን። እኛ ኢኮኖሚያዊ ስደተኞች አይደለንም። እኛ በቀላሉ ለመኖር ስንል የመጣን ስደተኞች አይደለንም። እኛ በእውነት የመጣነው ከእስልምና አምልጠን ነው። አሁን በመንገዴ ላይ እየተራመድኩኝ አሳዳጆቼን ሳይ በጣም አዝናለሁ። ለአሳዳጆች እን ለተበዳዮች በአንድ ጊዜ ጥገኝነት የሰጠች አንዲት አገር ጀርመን ብቻ ናት። ይሄ የሚሰራ ነገር አይደለም። በጣም የሚገርመው አንድ ክርስቲያናዊ ነኝ የሚል የሜርከል ፓርቲ ከሙስሊሞች ጋር እየተጣመረ አብሮ መስራቱ ነው። ይህ ምንም ትርጉም አይኖረውም!እስላማዊ ዘመቻው ምስጢር አይደለም፡ ክፍት ነው!
በአንድ ወቀት፡ በአንደኛ ደረጃ ትምህርት ቤት ሴት ልጄን ለምን ወደ እስልምና ትምህርት ክፍል አልላክሺም ተብዬ በ ርእሰ መምህሩ ተጠራሁ። በአራት አመት ውስጥ እርሱን ለማነጋገር እድል ያገኘሁት በዙህ አጋጣሚ ነበር። እንግዲህ እኔ በኢራን ውስጥ የተወለድኩ በመሆኔ ነው በርእሰ መምህሩ የተጠራሁት…አንድ የኢራናዊት ልጅዋን ወደ እስልምና ትምህርት የመላክ ፍጹም ፍላጎት ይኑራት አይኑራት፣ ክርስቲያን ትሁን እስላም፣ ሌላ ዓይነት የሕይወት ልምምድ ይኖራት፤ ምንም የጠየቁት ነገር የልም፤ እንዲያው ዝም ብለው ከቱርክ የመጣችው ሴት እስልምናን ለመማር በጣም ስለምትፈልግ ብቻ በፖሊስ በኩል ሁሉ ተጽዕኖ ሊያደርግብኝ ይፈልግ ነበር።
ሁሉም አንድ ዓይነት እንደሆነ አድርገው ነው የሚያዩት፤ የሚመጡት ሰዎች የተለያዩ ሊሆኑ እንደሚችሉ የመገመቱ ፍላጎት የላቸውም። አንዳንድ ወደ ጀርመን የመጡ ሰዎች የጀርመናውያን የአኗኗር ዘይቤ ስለሚወዱ እዚህ መኖር ይፈልጋሉ፡ የማህበረስቡ አካል መሆን ይፈልጋሉ። ግን ጀርመናውያንን በቀላሉ ሊያጠፏቸው የሚፈልጓቸው ሰዎችም ደግሞ በመካከላችን አሉ። እና ይሄ ሁኔታ መለወጥ ይኖርበታል!
በእርግጥም፤ እውነተኛ የሆኑ ስደተኞች አሉ፡ ችግሩ ግን ምንም ልዩነት አይደረግም። እነዚህ ሰዎች ለምን ወደዚህ እንደሚመጡ ማንም አይጠይቅም። እውነተኛ ስደተኞች ድንበሮችን እንኳን ማለፍ የማይችሉበት እውነታ አለ። ብዙ የቪዲዮዎች ማስረጃዎች አሉ። እንደ ቱርክ በመሳሰሉት አገሮች ውስጥ የሚሰደዱት ክርስቲያኖች በእርግጥ ጉድጓድ ውስጥ ገብተው እየሞቱ ነው። የአገራቱ ድንበሮቹ ሁሉ በሙስሊሞች ወንዶች ነው የሚጠበቁት። ለነርሱ የሚሰሩትንና የሚፈልጓቸውን ስደተኞች ወይም ሙስሊሞችን እየመረጡ ነው የሚያሳልፉት። ለምሳሌ ያህል ቱርክ ሙስሊሞችን ነው ወደ አውሮፓ የምትልከው። እውነተኛ ስደተኞች እድሉም አቅሙም የላቸውም። የቱርክ መንግሥት ለኤሪን መንግስት ደብዳቤ በመጻፍ የአንድ ኩርድን ስደተኛ ቤተሰቦቹ በቱርክ ውስጥ በቁጥጥር ስር እንደዋለና ለዚህም የቱርክ መንግስት ገንዘብ እንደሚያገኝ። ከአውሮፓውያንማ በቢሊየን የሚቆጠር ገንዘብ እየተቀበለ ነው። እና እውነተኛ ስደተኞች ወደ ሀገራቸው ተጠርፈው ወይ በእስር ይማቅቃሉ ወይ ደግሞ ይገደላሉ። ስለዚህ የሰብዓዊ መብት የሚባለው ቅስቀሳ ዘመቻ ቅጥፈት ነው።
ለመሥራት የማይፈልጉ በሚልዮን የሚቆጠሩ ሙስሊም ስደተኞች አሁን እዚህ አሉ። እንዲያውም በጀርመን ቴሌቪዥን ውስጥ አንድ ሪፖርት ቀርቦ ነበር፤ ምናልባትም በአንድ ጊዜ ብቻ ታይቶ ሊሆን ይችላል፤ ሙስሊም ሰዎች የማስታወቂያ ዘመቻ በአገሮቻቸው በማድረግ አራት ሚስቶች እና ባልቶችን ለማስመጣት በቅተዋል፤ ይህ ሚስጢር አይደለም። አንድ ሙስሊም በርካታ ሚስቶች ሊኖሩት ስለሚችል፤ በጀርመን መንግስት የእርዳታ ገንዘብ በነፃ ይከፈለዋል በማለት እያወጁ ነው፤ “ወደ ጀርመን ኑ! ዳግም ሥራ መሥራት አይኖርባችሁም።” ይላሉ። ይህ ትክክል አይደለም፡ እነዚህ ሰዎች ስርዓቱን እያራቆቱ ነው። መንግስትም ያውቃል፡ ነገር ግን እርምጃ ለመውሰድ ተኮላሽቷል።
10 ኛውን ልጅ በፀነሰች ጊዜም እንኳ ሳይቀር ተሸፋፍና ወደ መንገስታዊ ተቋም በመሄድ ሙሉ ደፍተው “ዳንስ ቤት ውስጥ ሰክሬ ከማላውቀ ሰው ጸነስኩ” በማለት የተሻለ ገንዘብ ለማግኘት ያለቅሳሉ። ምክንያቱም አባት ገና ካልታወቀ ለልጆቹ ተጨማሪ ገንዘብ አለና። እና ኩሩው ሙስሊም አባቱ በሁለት እጆቹ መካከል ሁለት ሴቶች ያስቀምጣል። በዚህም የማጭበርበሪያ ተግባረቸው በኩራት ይናገራሉ።
ይህ ብልሹነት መቆም አለበት!ህዝቡ ግራ ተጋብቷል። በሳምንት መጨረሻ ላይ በዋና ዋና መንገዶች ላይ ይሂዱ እና ፎቶግራፉን በደንብ ማየት ይችላሉ። አንድም ጀርመን በጎዳናው ላይ ፈልጌ ማየት ሳልችል በሀዘን ስሜት እሞላለሁ። ከኢሬን የሚመጡ ጎብኚዎች እንኳን ኢራንን ለመተው በጣም ከባድ በሆነበት ጊዜ እድሉን አግኝተን እዚህ ስንመጣ ይህን ጉድ ማየታቸው በጣም እያሳዘናቸው ነው። ሴቶች በኢራን በቤት ውስጥም መሸፈን አለባቸው፤ እዚህ ነፃነት አለባት በሚባልባት አገር እንዲህ ተሸፋፍነው የሚሂዱ ብዙ ሙስሊሞችን ማየታቸው እያሳዘናቸው፤ ጀርመን ጀርመናዊ አይደለችም በማለት ያስጠነቅቃሉ።
በተጨማሪም አንድ ጓደኛዬ ስለ ፓሪስ እንዲህ ብሎ ነበር፦ “እኔ ኮሌጅ በነበርኩበት ጊዜ፣ በወጣትነቴና በልጅነቴ ያወቅኋትን ቆንጆ, ነፃ እና የምታምር ከተማ አይደለችም ፓሪስ።“
እና ከራሴ ልምድና ገጠመኝ፡ እስልምና በጀርመን ውስጥ ቦታ እንደሌለው በግልፅ ለመናገር እፈልጋለሁ
እኔ ያደግሁት በሙስሊም አገር ውስጥ ነው፡ ስለዚህ እስልምናን አጠንቅቄ አውቀዋለሁ።
የኔ ጥያቄዎች፦
የአውሮፓ ሚዴያ የአፍሪቃ ስደተኞች ሊወሩን ነው እያሉ 24/7 ህዝቦቻቸውን በማስፈራራት ላይ ናቸው። የሚገርመው የአፍሪቃውያን ስደተኞች ቁጥር፡ ከአርቡ ጋር ሲወዳደር፤ በጣም ጥቂት ነው። ለምን ይቀጥፋሉ? ብለን ብንጠይቅ፤ ሉሲፈራውያኑ ህዝቡን በአፍሪቃውያን በማስፈራራት አጋሮቻቸው የሆኑትን ህፃናት ደፋሪዎቹን ሙስሊሞች እንዲቀበል እያለማመዱት መሆኑን በግልጽ እንረዳለን — አውሮፓዊ ከጥቁር ክርስቲያን፣ ቀላ ያለ ሙስሊም ይመርጣልና። በሮማ ያየነው ጭካኔ ይህን ነው የሚነግረን።
የደቡብ ሱዳን ሰደተኞች በአውሮፓና አሜሪካ የሉም ማለት ይቻላል። ምክኒያቱ፤ ኢትዮጵያና ኡጋንዳ ስለሚቀበሏቸው እንዲሁም አውሮፓውያንና አረቦች ስለማይፈልጓቸው።
አፍሪቃውያን ስደተኞች አውስትራሊያ ሆነ ሜክሲኮ ድረስ ሄደው እድላቸውን ይሞክራሉ፡
ለምንድን ነው በቱርክ ሚዲተራንያን በኩል አፍሪቃውያን ስደተኞች የማይታዩት? መልሱ፤ ወደ አውሮፓ ስለማያሳልፏቸው፣ ስለሚያርዷቸው።
Addis Ethiopia Weblog 