Vaccinated African Children 5x Increase In Mortality

…and then when they received the DTP only, that rate increased to 10x

Dtp-Vaccinated African Infants Had A Higher Death Rate Than Unvaccinated Infants, According To New “vax/unvax” Study

A study published earlier this month (see HERE ) examining the effect of vaccination on mortality in 3-5 month old infants in the West African nation of Guinea-Bissau showed a fivefold higher death rates in infants who received diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) and oral polio (OPV) vaccines compared to unvaccinated infants. The study, published in the journal EBioMedicine by Danish researchers from the Statens Serum Institut (SSI), was based on infants born between 1980 and 1983 and used data collected by the SSI’s Bandim Health Project (BHP). The study of vaccinated and unvaccinated African infants represents a rare, albeit limited, example of the kind of “vaxxed/unvaxxed’ study that many critics of American vaccination policy have long called for.

In their prospective study of over 1,000 infants, the SSI authors examined the effects on infant mortality of a new vaccination program that included both OPV and DTP vaccines. They reserved their harshest assessment for the newly introduced DTP vaccine, observing pointedly that “DTP was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP.”

In a broader criticism of global vaccine policy, the authors continued, “Unfortunately, DTP is the most widely used vaccine, and the proportion who receives DTP3 [three doses of the DTP vaccine] is used globally as an indicator of the performance of national vaccination programs.” In a further criticism of DTP vaccines, the analysis suggests that the OPV, which was typically administered together with DTP vaccine, had a moderating effect on the death risk of DTP. When (due to logistical problems with OPV availability) infants were vaccinated with DTP only, the death rates were even worse: as much as ten times higher than unvaccinated infants.

Unlike the recently leaked “vax/unvaxxed” study on homeschool children (see HERE) and the more commonly understood usage today of the “vaxxed/unvaxxed” concept, this analysis was narrower. The study examined infants during a brief window of time—the period between 3 and 6 months of age–and measured a single outcome—death. Described by the authors as a “natural experiment,” the study was designed in order to address on ongoing debate over the efficacy in low-income countries of the Expanded Immunization Program (EPI) since its introduction in the 1970s. At the time, the EPI targeted countries like Guinea-Bissau that had high infant mortality rates–under-five mortality rates were close to 50% there in 1978-9—and included four vaccines for seven diseases. Since individual vaccines included in the EPI might have different effects, the authors decried the absence of “individually randomized studies,” noting that “surprisingly few studies examined the introduction of vaccines and their impact on child survival.”

Due to its specific focus, the study design has little to say about the vaccine schedule debate in high-income countries and has several key limitations. Most notably, the “unvaccinated” children in the BHP study group only remained unvaccinated for a period of less than 14 weeks between 3 and 6 months of age until they attended the “quarterly weighing sessions” when OPV and DTP vaccines were administered. Even this briefly unvaccinated group wasn’t fully unvaccinated. The authors noted that “of the 651 unvaccinated children, 219 received DTP and/or OPV before their first weighing examination. These children counted as ‘unvaccinated’ until their first weighing examination.” Even though the death rate in the unvaccinated group was lower than in the vaccinated group, death rates were high on both sides. Five of the eighteen deaths covered in the study period occurred in the unvaccinated group and the authors don’t disclose whether any of these deaths had received a vaccination before the official examination “landmarks” used to define vaccination events in the database.

Despite the unusual nature of their “natural experiment”, this new BHP paper does offer some useful information for developed world vaccination debate, in which many express concern over excessively aggressive vaccine schedules that mandate “too many, too soon”. In that debate, the question of designing alternative schedules based on different health benefits of individual vaccines has risen to the fore as a number of doctors have offered non-standard schedules that depart from officially sanctioned schedules of public health authorities like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO).

Guinea-Bissau offers an opportunity for a natural experiment in vaxxed/unvaxxed science because the population there was largely unvaccinated until late in the 20th century. The BHP “took part in the introduction of vaccines” in Bandim starting in 1981; until the launch of the WHO’s Expanded Program on Immunization in that year, vaccination coverage in Guinea-Bissau was below 5%. The EPI schedule that was introduced in Bandim included several live attenuated vaccine strains: one dose of the BCG (tuberculosis) vaccine at birth, three doses of OPV starting at 3 months and one dose of measles vaccine after 9 months. In addition, three doses of the DTP vaccine, with its three inactivated bacterial components, were given along with the OPV starting at 3 months. Since “the disease protective effects [of the EPI] were well documented,” the BHP authors said, little effort went into studying the overall health effects of the program as a whole. Instead, “the main issue was at which age to introduce the [individual] vaccine most effectively.”

Dr. Peter Aaby, the senior author on this month’s paper, has long made the case for assessing the broad health effects of individual vaccines. Aaby founded the BHP in 1978 and has observed vaccination programs in Africa for decades since. He has argued for some time that there is a distinction between the health effects of live attenuated and inactivated vaccines. Aaby has argued for instance, that the health benefits of measles vaccination (an attenuated live virus) go beyond the prevention of deaths associated with acute measles infection. By contrast, Aaby has argued that DTP vaccines have had no such broad benefit. In this most recent study, he makes the case against DTP even more strongly, demonstrating that DTP vaccines sharply increased death rates in African infants.

Aaby’s theory that the “non-specific effects” (NSEs) of vaccination outweigh their effect on disease prevention suggests a more nuanced view of vaccination schedules than the simple “pro-vaccine vs anti-vaccine” controversy touted in most media coverage of the vaccine debate. If different vaccines can have opposing non-specific effects, then the net benefits of an overall schedule would require close monitoring and the detailed design of vaccine schedules would be a subject for policy debate rather than the all-or-nothing stance of many public health officials. In their recent paper, the BHP authors offer support for the need to assess the health effects of the entire EPI schedule rather than the disease protection effects of individual vaccines. Despite past BHP publications providing evidence for beneficial NSEs of the measles vaccines contained in the EPI introduced in Guinea-Bissau, the overall health outcomes that ensued following the EPI’s introduction were negative. In their new paper, the BHP authors showed that infant death rates following the new vaccine program introduction more than doubled, going from 4.7 per 100 person-years in 1980 to 12.1 in 1983.

Harsh criticism of one of the foundational pieces of the modern immunization schedule is notable when it comes from an insider like Dr. Aaby. His conclusion that “all currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis” is an urgent call for action from the WHO.

Source

— Ethiopia: Analytical Summary – Immunization And Vaccines Development

— Historic Commitment from African Heads of State to Advance Immunization in Africa

— SHOCK STUDY: Countries With Highest Vaccination Rates Have Highest Infant Mortality Rates, Too

— 2017 Research Shows Every Human Vaccine Is Contaminated With Inorganic Chemical Compounds – 44 Vaccines Tested

Why The Hell Is A Computer Software Person (Bill Gates) Even Involved In Vaccine? I’ve got a very eerie feeling about this guy

__

Germany: Muslim Migration Office Employee Denies Asylum Application Of Iraqi Christians

“We came here to live a free life, but now were are being oppressed heavily.”

A Christian family fleeing from religious persecution in Iraq claim asylum in Germany, only to have their application denied by a Muslim employee working at the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees.

CDU party politician Wolfgang Bosbach criticizes the practice of Muslim employees processing asylum claims of persecuted Christians. Authorities in Nuremberg however, defend the practice.

The case came to light after the family reported their experience to Bosbach, stating they felt disadvantaged that a Muslim had been assigned to handle their asylum claim.

Bosbach noted: “It’s incomprehensible to me that solely Muslims working at the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees should decide whether Christians fleeing from radical Muslims are allowed to stay in Germany or not.”

German media on this case:

http://www.focus.de/politik/videos/bo…

https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschla…

50 Christian Statues Have Been Defaced And Decapitated In Germany In The Past 2 Years…Likely By Muslim Migrants

Selected comments:

Germany along with most of the rest of the EU is committing suicide.

I only feel very bad about such things.

How can one pretend to stand on moral, or humanitarian grounds when they openly admit to their inhumane bigotry? This is reverse reality, in which insanity prevails & where good is seen as evil & evil is seen as good.

As a Third Party I have no words to express the disgust I feel at the way Christians are oppressed most cruelly and Muslims are accommodated favorably. Even inhumanity should have its limits.

How can these persecuted Christians feel? Come to a Christian country with a chancellor, whose party the Christian C carries in the name.

In refugee centers, those who have been bullied, humiliated, humiliated, and threatened with the death from which they fled have been bullied by them.

One has the impression that the persecutors have been following, or persecuted the persecuted because they have no more prey left in their homeland. And then a headscarfed Exhibitionist Muslim woman may decide her future destiny. Simply incredible. I do not have anything to do with Christianity either, and I’ve been out of the club for a long time, but I have not been so bad for a long time, and I rarely had such anger in my stomach as with this inconceivable message.

Western leader God-haters do everything in their power to prevent Christians from escaping severe Muslim persecution.

Western ruling elites massively imported Muslims into our nations. The Muslims are then given places of great power in government positions to enable the Muslims to massively discriminate against, and persecute Christians.

Christians are Mostly Barred Entry into Our Nations by Western leaders. Western ruling elites want ONLY Muslims — the devout followers of Barbaric Warlord Mohammad.

Western leaders are Great Admirers of Cruel Muslim Conquerors. The 56 Muslim Nations did not Choose to become Islamic. They were FORCED to.

Muslims Conquered 56 Nations By the Sword.

While deniers are denying the Armenian and Jewish genocides …. the Chaldean genocide rages on …. along with the Coptic genocide, etc. etc. ?

Germans have always been allies with Muslims.They were allies with the Turks in ww1 to exterminate Greeks, Armenians, Slavic, Assyrians, Pontiacs.

In WW2 Germans and Muslim Bosnia, Albania where involved killing Serbs, Greeks, Jews, gypsies.

Germany the mastermind behind the NATO bombing of Serbia, and arming Islamic terror groups to kill Serbs.

Destroying orthodox Greece thanks to the austerity and the Islamic invasion of Greece thanks to Mrs Merkel’s lefties in Germany and the left wing German backed dictatorship in Greece.

Germany, where Marxism and Nazism was born. Now Islamism is being promoted by Germany.

Muslims are a health and safety issue. Why in the hell is Germany using Muslims, to say who may or may not come into the country??? Christians are being denied, while Muslims get the welcome mat.

This is so damn typical, no Muslim should be working in Immigration, already they are prejudice against Christians this is sickening, where is justice?

What are the German authorities doing? Putting a Muslim in charge of deciding if a Christian family is eligible for asylum is so stupid it beggars belief! And for one of the BAMF staff to come up with an excuse regarding the wearing of headscarves by stating that “constitutionally women are allowed to wear them” is a cop out! Whoever it was, knew exactly what the problem was, and refused to acknowledge the genuine concerns. Was this person also wearing a headscarf?

It is beginning to look more and more that government are ignoring the plight of Christians in order to appease Muslims again. Why have they got a Muslim or Muslims employed in such a sensitive position? It’s well know they will infiltrate all areas of government in order to disrupt from within. This is verging on insanity!

The Ministry of Internal Affairs need to sort out their staff and make sure that a Muslim never has a position that allows them to decide on the future of a Christian family ever again.

Merkel has created a nightmare scenario for her own people, she must ensure that Muslims are kept from deciding the fate of others. They will always put Muslims first!

The BAMF as the bureaucracy deciding about is strongly undermined by leftist ad Muslim representatives. Only few prosecuted Christians are granted asylum whereas hordes of predominantly Muslim freeloaders sneak by, often with faked or even entirely without IDs.

The BAMF is officially part of the ministry of interior affairs however appears to act entirely independent and bypass the secretary of interiors. Even worse, when confronted with accusations of deliberately not reporting more than 3000 intruders with evidently fake IDs, the bureaucracy not only refused to disclose the suspects to federal prosecutors but refused cooperation entirely. An unprecedented affront in Germany’s legal post WW2 history and proof that secretary of interior affairs, de Maiziere, is nothing but a puppet on a string.

A key figure here is Merkel’s appointed Muslim commissioner for integration, Turkish born Aydan Özuguz. A leftist feminazi par excellence and strong promoter of pedophilia and REVERSE integration, she has two radicalized brothers who were suspects of supporting anti-constitutional, criminal activities. She is also openly and fiercely driving an Islamization agenda herself by encouraging dialogues with predominantly radical Muslim organizations and acting as one of Turkish autocrat Erdogan’s loudest mouthpieces in the country. As the coordinator for migration issues she’s a perfect fit for Merkel’s perfidious agenda of marginalizing the indigenous population by promoting Muslim invasion.

__